UA-69458566-1

Wednesday, September 9, 2020

Warning: Russia Escalates in Eastern Syria

Warning: Russia Escalates in Eastern Syria

 By: Eva Kahan

Key Takeaway: Russia is scaling up pressure against US forces in eastern Syria. Russia invigorated its effort to provoke fractures within the US local partner, the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), in early August through information operations tailored to sow doubt about the SDF’s reliability and the United States’ commitment to Syria. Russia and other pro-regime actors simultaneously scaled up a campaign of harassment of US forces, including rocket attacks on facilities housing US forces and a confrontation with a US patrol on August 25 that concussed four US soldiers.[1] These incidents could indicate that Russia is using kinetic activity to bolster the effect of its information operations in accordance with emerging Russian hybrid warfare doctrine, which ISW will examine in depth in a forthcoming report. The intended target of Russia’s information operation, local tribal elements loosely aligned with the SDF, could perceive the United States’ inability to prevent such attacks as a sign of weakness. In one of the most dangerous scenarios, Russia may further escalate kinetically to provoke a crisis that causes local tribal elements to desert the SDF with the eventual objective of forcing US policymakers to reconsider the US commitment to Syria.  

Tripwire

Russian state media conducted a sophisticated information operation against the SDF on August 4. Russia propagated two narratives in the Syrian information space in early August that exploited, amplified, and exaggerated existing causes of tribal unrest to produce greater pressure on the SDF.

  1. Tribal liberation. Russian state media outlet Sputnik News Arabic ran a story that exaggerated a local clash between tribal protesters and the SDF, skewing details to portray the incident as the start of a “liberation” battle against the SDF.[2] To evidence the story, the outlet published a video, the original source of which is unclear, of tribesmen waving guns and burning tires on an unidentified street, allegedly celebrating this “liberation.”[3] Sputnik News claimed that the video showed tribesmen capturing SDF members, which it did not and which likely never occurred.[4] A Facebook page that claims to speak for the leading Aqidat tribe posted the same video along with a caption encouraging other tribes to defect from the SDF and continue this “battle.”[5] The statement was crafted to emphasize tribal freedom and independence rather than calling narrowly for a pivot to Russia, the Assad regime, or Turkey. The page was infrequently active since 2014 until posts spiked in July 2020. The main owner of the page is likely a member of the Aqidat tribe based in Qatar. Kremlin-run news outlet RT replicated and amplified this announcement about “the liberation of Deir ez-Zour” and tribal “control over villages” without confirming or denying its message.[6] The narrative of tribal liberation spread widely, propagated by pro-Assad and pro-Turkish actors as well as many people who were previously supportive of the SDF.[7]
  2. SDF abuse of protesters. RT and Sputnik News also published stories accusing the SDF of shooting at peaceful protesters in Hawayij on August 4.[8] Turkish and pro-regime social media accounts reshared and exaggerated these stories, claiming that the SDF shot women and used coalition aircraft to terrify the populace.[9] Security forces did fire at local citizens but may have been deliberately provoked. The SDF accused ISIS cells of beginning the violent engagement on August 4 and arrested alleged provocateurs on August 7 for starting the shooting.[10]

The success of this information operation demonstrated that narratives of SDF abuse of power and tribal “liberation” resonate across a range of communities with differing political goals. Russian state media ran a similar follow-on campaign, propagating a story of tribal “expulsion” and arrest of SDF members in Jadid Aqidat in eastern Deir ez-Zour on September 8, 2020.[11] 


Harassment incidents and low-level attacks targeting US forces increased after the information operation. Pro-regime forces operating a checkpoint in Deir ez-Zour fired on a US and SDF joint patrol on August 17. US Combined Joint Task Force – Operation Inherent Resolve (CJTF-OIR) spokesperson stated that US and SDF forces returned fire in self-defense.[12] A rocket attack and mortar attack later targeted US forces near Conoco oil field on August 18 and 29, respectively.[13] Pro-regime insurgents had not attacked US forces at this rate before August 4, 2020, and last claimed an unconfirmed rocket attack on US forces in Raqqa province on April 13, 2018.[14]

A flurry of attack claims from relatively new anti-SDF insurgent groups bolstered Russia’s information operation. These claims include the checkpoint shooting and the rocket and mortar attacks on US forces near the Conoco oil field, but also include claims of attacks that ISW could not independently verify occurred. These groups may have gained access to new resources in August 2020 by exploiting gaps in SDF security as tribal unrest increased in Deir ez-Zour.[15] However, the claims in multiple cases appear likely to be false. These groups have likely accelerated information operations to portray the SDF as weak and under constant attack. ISW cannot assess at this time whether Russia is involved in these operations.

  • A new Iraqi Shi’a militia named Ashab al Kahf, which declared its formation in March 2020, claimed the mortar attack on Conoco oil field on August 29. This group has claimed attacks that were first claimed and likely committed by other Shi’a militias in Iraq, and this claim may also be an attempt to take credit for another group’s activity.[16]
  • A pro-Assad insurgent group, the Popular Resistance on the Eastern Front (PREF), claimed the August 18 rocket attack on US forces near Conoco oil field, claiming it was retribution for the checkpoint shootout on August 17.[17] The group also claimed 17 unconfirmed attacks on SDF forces between August 8 and September 1.[18]
  • Another pro-Assad insurgent group, the Popular Resistance in the Syrian Desert (PRSD), expanded its media presence and claimed the August 18 rocket attack on US forces near Conoco oil field. The group also claimed another unconfirmed attack on US forces and four unconfirmed attacks on SDF forces between August 15 and September 1.[19]
  • The Revolutionaries in the Land of Deir ez-Zour (RLDZ), an insurgent group that claims linkages to Turkish proxy forces in northern Syria, claimed an unconfirmed attack that the group says killed nine SDF members in eastern Deir ez-Zour and called for tribes to rebel against the SDF on August 4.[20] The RLDZ also claimed an attack that killed a Russian major general on August 18 that was more likely conducted by ISIS. Some of RLDZ’s claims might be true, but at least some of them are likely part of a deliberate information operation. 
 



Russian forces also escalated against a US patrol in Hasakah to reinforce Russia’s information operation. A Russian armored vehicle deliberately crashed into an US patrol in Malikiyah, Hasakah Province, on August 25. Russian state media widely broadcast the incident and claimed that US forces refused to deconflict, causing the incident.[22] Russian military forums distributed videos showing the encounter, which show a Russian helicopter flying threateningly close to US vehicles and US forces withdrawing from the area. The Russian-language Telegram channel WarJournal initially released a video of the clash taken by someone in a nearby crowd of Hasakah residents.[23] Russian nationalist website Rusvesna.su published a higher-definition video on August 26 taken by the Russian driver and included the Russian state media’s narrative.[24] The video spread quickly on social media. The US Department of Defense acknowledged that US forces retreated in order to deescalate, allowing Kremlin-run media to spin this encounter as a Russian victory.[25] US media covered the incident extensively, noting that four US soldiers may have sustained concussions and questioning the importance of their mission in eastern Syria.[26] This media reaction advanced Russia’s effort to undermine US popular support for the mission in Syria, which was likely one of the intended effects of Russia’s escalation.

Pattern

Pro-Assad forces seek to constrain and ultimately eject US forces from eastern Syria. Russia, Iran, and the Assad regime expanded their presence in eastern Syria beginning in mid-2017. Pro-Assad forces reclaimed land from ISIS, including oil and gas infrastructure, in western and southern Deir ez-Zour by exploiting US military pressure on ISIS in eastern Deir ez-Zour.[27] Pro-Assad forces conducted multiple probing attacks on US forces to test US responses in 2017, targeting the US Tanf garrison with ground forces, including artillery and a tank, and targeting an SDF force near Raqqa with an airstrike in June 2017.[28] The United States responded decisively to these incidents at the tactical level, signaling resolve and compelling pro-Assad forces to recalibrate. In the sharpest escalation to date, hundreds of Russian Wagner Group contractors, pro-regime militia fighters and likely Lebanese Hezbollah forces assaulted an SDF position near the Conoco oil field on February 7, 2018.[29] Co-located US forces conducted force protection strikes that halted the pro-regime advance and imposed significant casualties, killing as many as 300 Wagner members.[30] The cost of the attack deterred Russia from repeating this tactic but did not deter lower level escalation. Lebanese Hezbollah and a regime militia attacked SDF-held positions again on April 29th, 2018, forcing the SDF to abandon three villages northwest of Deir ez-Zour city for several hours.[31] US forces performed self-defense strikes against Assad forces approaching the Tanf garrison held by US partner force Maghawir al Thawra on June 21, 2018, and possibly on other occasions.[32]

Russia shifted to a more indirect approach after its February 2018 defeat, attempting to siphon tribal support away from the SDF. Russia scaled up outreach to tribal elements in eastern Syria, for example hosting Shammar tribe sheikh Humaydi Daham al Jardba, who leads an SDF force in Hasakah Province, at Hmeimim Airbase on February 19, 2019.[33] US policy inadvertently aided Russia’s effort when President Donald Trump threatened to withdraw US troops from Syria in October 2019, ceding a major opportunity for Russia to step in.[34] Nawaf Abd al Aziz al Muslat, a likely Russian-backed tribal leader in the Jubour tribe, convened a meeting of tribal leaders in Tell Tamr, Hasakah to discuss the creation of an independent tribal militia to combat the SDF two weeks after President Trump’s statement.[35] Syria Direct, which leverages local Syrian sources, reported that participants in the meeting called for Russian Military Police to fill the gap left by departing US troops.[36] Russian state media also scaled up Arabic language coverage of eastern Syria that portrays Russian negotiators as allies of the tribes, advocates the return of SDF-held oilfields to local stakeholders, and depicts SDF security forces as neglectful and abusive.[37] These efforts shaped the narrative around tribal opposition to the SDF but were not able to cause significant tribal defections before Russian efforts escalated in August 2020.

Iran, the Assad regime, and Turkey also scaled up their own information operations and tribal outreach with a similar broad purpose: to undermine the SDF and recruit tribal support away from its military and governance structures. Iran and other pro-Assad forces have attempted to recruit tribes to defect from the SDF and join parallel pro-regime forces. Iran worked closely with the Baqara tribe to recruit tribesmen into Liwa al-Baqir, and other Iranian-backed militias.[38] Iran or other pro-Assad forces solicited defections from SDF leadership and the pro-SDF Civil Council in early 2019.[39] Iran also established new Shi’a mosques and Iranian cultural centers in Deir ez-Zour to expand its social outreach.[40] Turkey has also conducted tribal outreach and hosted tribal leaders for meetings, although these efforts have mainly focused on tribes of northwestern Syria.[41]  Iranian-backed tribal organizations have failed to recruit significant support on the eastern bank of the Euphrates due to the Assad regime and Iran’s limited financial capacity under the pressure of US sanctions, as well as Israeli airstrikes which have maintained pressure on Iranian maneuver and resourcing in Syria. Russian and Iranian efforts have been alternatingly aligned and competitive as the two Assad backers compete over control of resources within Deir ez-Zour and ground lines of communication between Syria and Iraq.[42] Turkish efforts have also failed due to lack of contact with tribes of eastern Syria. Finally, each actor has sponsored insurgent groups to carry out small-scale attacks against the SDF and tribes collaborating with the SDF and lobbied for tribal support in the information space. For example, Turkey likely sponsored a separate insurgent group that sought to eliminate members of SDF leadership starting in late 2017 in addition to the RLDZ.[43] These attacks have degraded the security situation of eastern Syria and contributed to tribal resentment against the SDF.

Timing

A crisis of confidence in the SDF in Deir ez-Zour reached a new threshold in July as a result of the overlapping destabilizing efforts of ISIS, Turkey, and pro-Assad actors. The SDF has carried out anti-ISIS operations in Arab areas to try and meet the tribes’ demands for improved security, but these operations have themselves generated tribal pushback to the SDF. ISIS is conducting an assassination campaign that by July 15, 2020, had triggered a tribal mobilization demanding better security from the SDF.[44] Arab tribes in SDF-controlled eastern Syria conducted large-scale protests in April and May 2019 focused on service provision, but these protests shifted significantly to focus on population security in July 2020.[45] Pro-Assad insurgent groups, including the PREF and likely regime-sponsored assassination cells, conduct attacks that worsen the impact of ISIS’s destabilizing campaign.[46] The SDF conducted a broad anti-ISIS operation in the area where ISIS and regime attacks are concentrated, between Busayrah, Shuheil, Zir, and Ibriha, from July 17-20 in response to tribal demands for improved security.[47] The SDF again received backlash. Tribes from Busayrah and nearby Hawayij protested the SDF throughout the operation, accusing the SDF of conducting sweeping arrests of activists.[48] Pro-Turkish and pro-Assad media exploited the unrest to advance information operations against the SDF, fueling the protests. For example, pro-Turkish information outlets accused SDF units of livestock theft in Shuheil under the hashtag “Return_Our_Sheep” on July 20.[49] Pro-regime media also spread a statement allegedly sent to them by Deir ez-Zour tribes calling on the international community for protection on July 20.[50] The SDF’s failure in the information space further eroded trust in the SDF despite its efforts to provide security for these communities. Russian media was not significantly involved in the information space as this crisis began in late July but began to advance its information campaign roughly two weeks later, likely after taking time to prepare its response.

Russia exploited a tipping point on August 2, when gunmen assassinated a prominent tribal leader, Mutashar al Hifl.[51] ISIS is most likely responsible for the assassination, but the tribal backlash against the SDF that ensued afterwards created a window of opportunity for Russia to scale up its campaign. Several tribal leaders accused the SDF of orchestrating Mutashar al Hifl’s assassination or deliberately neglecting to protect him.[52] Leaders of the Aqidat tribe who reacted to the assassination are broadly divided into three camps that alternately support the Assad regime, a tribal independence movement, or the SDF.[53] Some pro-independence tribal leaders rejected SDF governance in Deir ez-Zour after the incident, an escalation in their responses to date that aligns with the efforts of pro-regime tribal leaders to undermine the SDF.[54] A fractured group of pro-independence clans demanded on August 11 that the SDF devolve administration to the tribes by September 11.[55] This faction and/or its clans may attempt to expel the SDF by force and establish liberated self-rule if the SDF does not meet their terms, severely disrupting counter-ISIS operations.

Assessment

A major push by Russia or other pro-Assad actors in the next few weeks could seriously threaten the US effort to de-escalate tribal unrest in northeast Syria. US forces in Syria and their SDF partners are attempting to mitigate this crisis and likely secured an agreement to maintain the support of the pro-SDF Bakir clan of the Aqidat tribe at a large tribal meeting on August 13.[56] The SDF, with US support, may be negotiating further agreements with the pro-independence movement. These negotiations will continue to face significant push-back from the extremes of the tribal independence camp and, more notably, pro-regime actors working to exacerbate tribal-SDF tensions and erode the negotiating position of US forces. Russian-backed forces could use the cover of a tribal insurgency to instigate further attacks on US forces, forcing the US to calibrate a response to both domestic and Syrian audiences that depicts US forces as neither overinvolved nor under-committed. US forces are constrained by a limited mission set that allows them to support SDF anti-ISIS operations, conduct show of force patrols, and engage in limited social outreach but does not enable them to play larger role in stabilization. The US does not maintain a significant civilian or diplomatic presence on the ground, which limits US influence and its ability to provide clarifying information to the local population.

US policy may be more vulnerable to this pressure during the tense US presidential election. President Trump may feel pressured to again announce a withdrawal US forces from Syria in order to help his reelection campaign.[57] US media outlets frequently portray the presence of US troops in Syria as posing an undue risk to those soldiers’ lives.[58] Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden highlighted this risk at a campaign event by criticizing President Trump for failing to “lift one finger” in response to service member injuries in the ramming incident on August 25.[59] This line of argument may drive President Trump to announce a troop withdrawal in order to reduce risk to his campaign.

Russia is moving military reinforcements southeast to Deir ez Zour under the cover of anti-ISIS operations that, in the most dangerous scenario, could support tribal secession on the eastern bank of the Euphrates. The Russian Ministry of Defense announced the start of a counter-ISIS operation named “White Desert” on August 26 after the assassination of Russian Major General Vyacheslav Gladkikh west of Mayadeen on August 18.[60] Russia conducted extensive air operations against ISIS targets in the Central Syrian Desert and moved Russian-backed SAA 5th Corps units from Raqqa Province to Deir ez-Zour City on August 21.[61] Russian-backed forces have withdrawn from much of the Deir ez-Zour countryside and concentrated in cities, possibly in preparation for larger-scale clearing operations. The Russian Ministry of Defense also announced plans to build a new cross-Euphrates bridge capable of moving military vehicles at Shmaytiyah north of Deir ez-Zour on August 26.[62] The bridge is unnecessary to fight ISIS in regime-held areas, but may help Russian forces stage cross-river operations against the SDF. Russian forces operate an additional cross-river bridge for civilian trade at Mare’eiyah, which was built in October 2019 after all previous bridges were destroyed by flooding.[63] If pro-independence or pro-regime tribes continue to reject negotiated agreements with the SDF, Russian-backed pro-regime forces may cross to the eastern bank in order to “protect” the local population from continued SDF rule. At minimum, Russia will use the bridge’s construction to posture as a valuable partner for Assad in his future attempts to pressure the SDF. Iranian-backed militias may also posture to attack or pressure the SDF in southeastern Deir ez-Zour independently.[64] Iranian military officials attempted to recruit and arm an anti-SDF “Tribal Army” in Deir ez-Zour on August 26, although it is unclear whether any tribes agreed to join said army.[65] Iranian force posture in Deir ez-Zour is likely designed to compete with Russian-backed force expansion as well as to confront the SDF.[66]

Russia may leverage the tribal pressure and possibly its own military pressure to attempt to compel senior SDF leadership to accept a new deal in Syria that constrains US forces or ejects them. Russia has already begun to sponsor new negotiations between Russian clients in the regime-tolerated opposition and the Syrian Democratic Council (SDC), the SDF’s political wing. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov brokered a meeting between Ilham Ahmed, the co-chair of the SDC, and leader Qadri Jameel, a member of the regime-tolerated Syrian Communist “People’s Will” party, in Moscow on August 31.[67] The two leaders announced an agreement that bolsters the SDC’s longstanding effort to gain inclusion in the Syrian diplomatic process.[68] SDC-regime negotiations have been stalled since August 2019 aside from a temporary resumption after the US indicated it might withdraw in October 2019. This meeting alone will not lead to the SDC’s inclusion into the Geneva-based Syrian peace process, but Russia may intend to build on this agreement to normalize the SDC within the Syrian diplomatic process under Russian patronage. This could give Russia leverage over both the SDC and the Assad regime, which wants access to the resources of eastern Syria.[69] Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov may have promoted SDC-regime engagement in his first visit to Syria since 2012 on September 7, 2020.[70] Russia also seeks to supplant the US diplomatic position as the SDC’s main partner. The SDF will continue to balance relationships with both the US and Russia in order to retain US support as long as possible but will continue to hedge against the possibility of a US withdrawal. Russian information operations that affect the SDF’s perception of US reliability could advantage Russia in this competition. 

Russia’s information campaign in northeast Syria is not fully calibrated and could be vulnerable to disruption. Russian state media advanced contradictory narratives regarding a prominent Facebook page that covers tribal matters in eastern Syria, demonstrating a failure to fully align their messaging. In a single article, RT cited the page’s posts as evidence of tribal rejection of the SDF but also claimed that a separate post on the page that contradicted Russia’s desired narrative was illegitimate.[71] This inconsistency in Russian messaging may demonstrate that Russian state media is still adapting to this new information environment and may be vulnerable to a focused coalition information effort.

Implications

America’s role in eastern Syria is vital. American forces are training and advising the SDF, the only competent exclusively counter-ISIS force in Deir ez-Zour. The SDF has thus far prevented a large-scale ISIS resurgence in eastern Deir ez-Zour on par with the campaign on the western side of the province. The US-led coalition should support the SDF-tribal partnership in the information space by publicizing high-publicity meetings, coalition-sponsored events, and news stories of tribal-SDF cooperation in order to enable continued coalition counter-ISIS presence in eastern Syria. The CJTF-OIR is still seen as a trusted broker by most of the tribes upon whose support the SDF relies. A CJTF-OIR presence in the information environment can defend the legitimacy of the SDF and increase support for tribal negotiations.  The US and SDF must be even more proactive about countering false narratives and providing accurate information to tribal stakeholders in eastern Syria. Some tribal leadership have already exposed multiple information operations as externally driven.[72] The US should help them broaden their message. Rumors that the SDF does not deny or clarify could be taken as truth by tribal leadership, priming them to oppose the SDF and possibly the US presence. US policy makers should also publicly emphasize US commitment to guaranteeing the SDF’s long-term success in countering ISIS alongside tribal partners in eastern Syria.

Russia and other anti-SDF actors will amplify any SDF misstep. CJTF-OIR and the SDF should expect disinformation to escalate around SDF counter-ISIS operations. The SDF arrested suspected ISIS members in response to unrest on August 16 and September 2, causing some localized unrest in the process.[73] Russian information operations will likely exploit and amplify this unrest. The SDF should also expect that counter-SDF protests, which are frequently videoed, will continue to provide a platform for rumors of SDF misbehavior. The SDF should be extremely cautious in their approach to protests and negotiate openly with local leaders in order to avoid misunderstandings or escalation.

Indicators

Russian information operations are a leading indicator of Russia's intended next steps. If Russia plans to provide support for a tribal insurgency against the SDF, they will likely set the stage for intervention on or shortly after September 11, when the tribes’ deadline expires. Russian state media would escalate reports elevating voices of anti-SDF tribal leadership on both the east and west banks in order to create an excuse for intervention and to unite east bank anti-SDF tribes with their west bank pro-regime tribal relatives.  Russian media would also likely contrast the regime’s peaceful relationship with tribes with tribal-SDF discord to emphasize that the Assad regime is the only sustainable governing body in Syria. These information campaigns may drive protests in eastern Deir ez-Zour to escalate and directly call for regime support. This situation would likely also be marked by escalating tribal movements to expel the SDF and possibly seize SDF weapons, endangering the counter-ISIS mission by preventing the SDF from conducting arrests or raids in villages from which it was expelled.

Russian state media will likely escalate its information campaign that undermines public confidence in eastern Syria regarding the US commitment to Syria. To do so, Russia may cause and publicize additional clashes with US forces or run false media stories that exaggerate a collapse of SDF-tribal alliances to a US audience. This campaign would rely on further kinetic activity, and Russian units or deniable pro-Assad insurgent forces may increasingly target US patrols in high-visibility clashes. Stories targeting specific members of CJTF-OIR or SDF leadership in order to delegitimize their negotiating power would indicate a concerning escalation of these disinformation efforts.

Further military preparation on the western bank of the river may also signal impending military escalation. Russia might build additional cross-river bridges in the days before a military intervention, likely locating them south of the current bridge toward al Busayra or Shuheil, where anti-SDF sentiment is high. The SDF began constructing a new military base in Shuheil on September 1 and may intend to build a concrete wall along parts of the SDF-regime border in response to early threats of an incursion by pro-regime forces.[74] Further SDF fortifications in this area could indicate additional Russian-enabled mobilization.

At a minimum, Russia will likely attempt to sabotage SDF-tribal negotiations that could close the window for pro-regime forces to exploit SDF weakness. Russian state media may attempt to use information operations to confuse the outcome of tribal-SDF negotiations, possibly by depicting a false tribal rejection of a deal. The original sources of any announced deal or deal rejection should be scrutinized. Kremlin media may attempt to discredit tribal representatives when a deal is announced. As the tribes of Deir ez-Zour are fractured into multiple tribes, clans, and political orientations, targeted attempts to speak with local allies are unlikely to be successful. CJTF-OIR communication to shape the information environment must be far-reaching and take advantage of social media.

Pro-Assad and pro-Turkish actors could escalate their anti-SDF efforts. Turkish state media may also be originating some anti-SDF information operations via Twitter and to a lesser degree Facebook, as well as through Turkish-funded think tanks and information centers.[75] Turkey sponsors an Arab tribal council, mainly incorporating tribes from Turkish-controlled northern Aleppo Province, and could convene these tribes to draw support for a Turkish anti-SDF offensive.[76] Pro-Assad media, including Iranian actors, have propagated anti-SDF information operations and may escalate these campaigns. Iran may use the media outlets of the Iranian-backed “Popular Resistance” militias in Deir ez-Zour to spread disinformation and set the stage for further pro-Assad or Iranian military action..The Assad regime may also attempt to pressure the SDF diplomatically while maintaining kinetic pressure through insurgent groups in Deir ez-Zour, although Russia is more likely to be successful with this approach.

 


[1] Eric Schmitt, “U.S. Troops Injured in Syria After Collision With Russian Vehicles”, New York Times, September 1, 2020, https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/26/world/middleeast/pentagon-russia-syria.html

[2] “[Arab Tribes invade bases of American-backed militias in Deir ez-Zour and capture their members… video,]” Sputnik News Arabic, August 4, 2020, https://arabic.sputniknews.com/arab_world/202008041046180496-%D9%82%D8%A8%D8%A7%D8%A6%D9%84-%D8%B9%D8%B1%D8%A8%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D8%AA%D9%82%D8%AA%D8%AD%D9%85-%D9%85%D9%82%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D9%8A%D9%84%D9%8A%D8%B4%D9%8A%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D9%84%D9%84%D8%AC%D9%8A%D8%B4-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A3%D9%85%D8%B1%D9%8A%D9%83%D9%8A-%D8%A8%D8%AF%D9%8A%D8%B1-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B2%D9%88%D8%B1-%D9%88%D9%8A%D8%A3%D8%B3%D8%B1%D9%88%D9%86-%D8%B9%D9%86%D8%A7%D8%B5%D8%B1%D9%87%D8%A7/

[3] The story was partly true but exaggerated. The RT article claimed that SDF members were captured, which appears to have no basis in fact or in the video. Deir Ezzor Now, a local news source, clarified that the SDF withdrew from three checkpoints but no SDF personnel were captured and tribal mediation was underway. Deir Ezzor Now, Twitter, August 4, 2020,  https://twitter.com/DeirEzzorNow/status/1290643974018027523

[4] “[Arab Tribes invade bases of American-backed militias in Deir ez-Zour and capture their members… video,]” Sputnik News Arabic, August 4, 2020, https://arabic.sputniknews.com/arab_world/202008041046180496-%D9%82%D8%A8%D8%A7%D8%A6%D9%84-%D8%B9%D8%B1%D8%A8%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D8%AA%D9%82%D8%AA%D8%AD%D9%85-%D9%85%D9%82%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D9%8A%D9%84%D9%8A%D8%B4%D9%8A%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D9%84%D9%84%D8%AC%D9%8A%D8%B4-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A3%D9%85%D8%B1%D9%8A%D9%83%D9%8A-%D8%A8%D8%AF%D9%8A%D8%B1-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B2%D9%88%D8%B1-%D9%88%D9%8A%D8%A3%D8%B3%D8%B1%D9%88%D9%86-%D8%B9%D9%86%D8%A7%D8%B5%D8%B1%D9%87%D8%A7/

[5] [Aqidat Tribe – the Official Page], Facebook, August 4, 2020, https://www.facebook.com/Alaqidat/posts/1957987374343923

[6] Osama Younis, “[Local source clarifies truth in Aqidat tribe announcements in Syria,]” Russia Today Arabic, August 4, 2020, https://arabic.rt.com/middle_east/1141179-%D9%85%D8%B5%D8%AF%D8%B1-%D9%85%D8%AD%D9%84%D9%8A-%D9%8A%D9%88%D8%B6%D8%AD-%D8%AD%D9%82%D9%8A%D9%82%D8%A9-%D8%A8%D9%8A%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D9%82%D8%A8%D9%8A%D9%84%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D9%83%D9%8A%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D9%81%D9%8A-%D8%B3%D9%88%D8%B1%D9%8A%D8%A7/

[7] “[Aqidat tribe threatens to evict SDF… and announces the beginning of ‘taking revenge,’]”, Levant News, August 4, 2020,

https://thelevantnews.com/2020/08/%D9%82%D8%A8%D9%8A%D9%84%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D9%83%D9%8A%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D8%AA%D8%AA%D9%88%D8%B9%D9%91%D8%AF-%D8%A8%D8%B7%D8%B1%D8%AF-%D9%82%D8%B3%D8%AF-%D9%88%D8%AA%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%86-%D8%A8/

Turkish-backed actors have also conducted information operations since August 2, resharing similar disinformation on August 4 with an emphasis on tribal claims of independence.[7]

Suriye Gundemi, Twitter, August 27, 2020, https://twitter.com/suriyegundemi_/status/1299054999566196736

As well as Euphrates News Network and Raqqa Documentation Center. There is extensive precedent for these operations, as reported by ISW in 2017:

Genevieve Casagrande, “Post-ISIS Insurgency Looms in Northern Syria,” Institute for the Study of War, November 7, 2017,

http://www.iswresearch.org/2017/11/post-isis-insurgency-looms-in-northern.html

[8] Osama Younis, “[Syria… injuries by gunfire on protests against the SDF in Deir ez-Zour,” Russia Today Arabic, August 4, 2020, https://arabic.rt.com/middle_east/1141017-%D8%B3%D9%88%D8%B1%D9%8A%D8%A7-%D8%AC%D8%B1%D8%AD%D9%89-%D9%81%D9%8A-%D8%A5%D8%B7%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%82-%D9%86%D8%A7%D8%B1-%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%89-%D9%85%D8%B8%D8%A7%D9%87%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D9%85%D8%B9%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%B6%D8%A9-%D9%84%D9%82%D8%B3%D8%AF-%D9%81%D9%8A-%D8%AF%D9%8A%D8%B1-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B2%D9%88%D8%B1/

[9] [Wadad Abd al Waham,] Twitter, August 4, 2020, https://twitter.com/wexP2S7t8yGMwRf/status/1290792286570389506;

[Abbas Sharifa,] Twitter, August 4, 2020, https://twitter.com/abbas_sharifeh/status/1290676523754815488

[10] ”[An Announcement About the Latest Developments in Deir ez-Zour,]” SDF Press, August 4, 2020,  https://sdf-press.com/?p=32523

[11] “[Aqidat tribe expels gunmen paid by the American military from an eastern Syrian village,]” Sputnik News, September 8, 2020, https://arabic.sputniknews.com/arab_world/202009081046486069-%D9%82%D8%A8%D9%8A%D9%84%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D9%83%D9%8A%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D8%AA%D8%B7%D8%B1%D8%AF-%D9%85%D8%B3%D9%84%D8%AD%D9%8A%D9%86-%D9%85%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%8A%D9%86-%D9%84%D9%84%D8%AC%D9%8A%D8%B4-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A3%D9%85%D8%B1%D9%8A%D9%83%D9%8A-%D9%85%D9%86-%D8%A8%D9%84%D8%AF%D8%A9-%D8%B4%D8%B1%D9%82%D9%8A-%D8%B3%D9%88%D8%B1%D9%8A%D8%A7/

“[Sources: Aqidat tribe expels gunmen paid by the American military from an eastern Syrian village,]” RT Arabic, September 8, 2020, https://arabic.rt.com/middle_east/1152282-%D9%85%D8%B5%D8%A7%D8%AF%D8%B1-%D9%82%D8%A8%D9%8A%D9%84%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D9%83%D9%8A%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B3%D9%88%D8%B1%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D8%AA%D8%B7%D8%B1%D8%AF-%D9%85%D8%B3%D9%84%D8%AD%D9%8A-%D9%82%D8%B3%D8%AF-%D8%A8%D9%84%D8%AF%D8%A9-%D8%B4%D8%B1%D9%82-%D8%B3%D9%88%D8%B1%D9%8A%D8%A7/

[12] "Rising Tension | US aircraft strike regime checkpoint south of al Qamishly Airbase, leaving many casualties,” SOHR, August 17, 2020, https://www.syriahr.com/en/179928/

OIR Spokesman Col. Miles B. Caggins III, Twitter, August 17, 2020, https://twitter.com/OIRSpox/status/1295334387828109314

[13] “[America Announces 3 Katyusha Rockets Falling close to its Base in Syria,]” El Balad, August 18, 2020, https://www.elbalad.news/4455028

“[American Base at Conico Oil Field is targeted by a Mortar,]” Syria TV, August 30, 2020, http://syria.tv/%D8%A7%D8%B3%D8%AA%D9%87%D8%AF%D8%A7%D9%81-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%82%D8%A7%D8%B9%D8%AF%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A3%D9%85%D9%8A%D8%B1%D9%83%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D9%81%D9%8A-%D8%AD%D9%82%D9%84-%D9%83%D9%88%D9%86%D9%8A%D9%83%D9%88-%D8%A8%D9%82%D8%B0%D9%8A%D9%81%D8%A9-%D9%87%D8%A7%D9%88%D9%86

[14] “Pro-regime militia claims strike on US forces in Raqqa Province,” Enab Baladi, April 13, 2018, https://www.enabbaladi.net/archives/220909

[15] “[American Base at Conico Oil Field is targeted by a Mortar,]” Syria TV, August 30, 2020, http://syria.tv/%D8%A7%D8%B3%D8%AA%D9%87%D8%AF%D8%A7%D9%81-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%82%D8%A7%D8%B9%D8%AF%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A3%D9%85%D9%8A%D8%B1%D9%83%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D9%81%D9%8A-%D8%AD%D9%82%D9%84-%D9%83%D9%88%D9%86%D9%8A%D9%83%D9%88-%D8%A8%D9%82%D8%B0%D9%8A%D9%81%D8%A9-%D9%87%D8%A7%D9%88%D9%86

[16] Hamdi Malik “Pro-Iran militias in Iraq wage 'fake news' campaign against US,” Al Monitor, June 2, 2020, https://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2020/06/iraq-militias-us-iran-pmu.html

Brian Carter, Nicole Millar, and Calvin Pugh, “Iraq Situation Report: July 22-28, 2020,” Institute for the Study of War, July 31, 2020, http://www.understandingwar.org/sites/default/files/Iraq%20Situation%20Report%20July%2022-282020.pdf

Evan Kohlmann, “Profile and Exclusive Interview with Iraqi Shiite Insurgents Ashab al-Kahf,” Intel Flashpoint, August 20, 2020, https://www.flashpoint-intel.com/blog/profile-and-exclusive-interview-with-iraqi-shiite-insurgents-ashab-al-kahf/

[17] [The Popular Resistance in the Eastern Front/East Euphrates], Facebook, August 18, 2020, https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=600202457317891&id=592452021426268

[18] [The Popular Resistance in the Eastern Front/East Euphrates], Facebook, https://www.facebook.com/%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D9%82%D8%A7%D9%88%D9%85%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B4%D8%B9%D8%A8%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D9%81%D9%8A-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D9%86%D8%B7%D9%82%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B4%D8%B1%D9%82%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D8%B4%D8%B1%D9%82-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%81%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%AA-592452021426268

[19] [The Popular Resistance in the Syrian Desert], Facebook, https://www.facebook.com/%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D9%82%D8%A7%D9%88%D9%85%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B4%D8%B9%D8%A8%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D9%81%D9%8A-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AC%D8%B2%D9%8A%D8%B1%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B3%D9%88%D8%B1%D9%8A%D8%A9-106518844500814/

http://www.iswresearch.org/2018/06/russia-and-iran-prepare-offensive.html

[20] This claim may have originated rumors that “9-11 SDF members die in clashes on August 4,” which are otherwise unconfirmed. Thairien, Telegram, August 4, 2020.

[21] Notably, this group appears to have divided in two in early August, one of which uses the old Facebook Page (“Popular Resistance of the Eastern Front,” Facebook, https://www.facebook.com/%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D9%82%D8%A7%D9%88%D9%85%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%88%D8%B7%D9%86%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D9%81%D9%8A-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D9%86%D8%B7%D9%82%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B4%D8%B1%D9%82%D9%8A%D8%A9-152466685450904/

) and one of which uses a new page (“Popular Resistance of the Eastern Front, East Euphrates,” Facebook, https://www.facebook.com/%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D9%82%D8%A7%D9%88%D9%85%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B4%D8%B9%D8%A8%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D9%81%D9%8A-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D9%86%D8%B7%D9%82%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B4%D8%B1%D9%82%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D8%B4%D8%B1%D9%82-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%81%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%AA-592452021426268). Both groups adopted new branding as of August 2020 that features prominent symbology (a raised fist and AK-47) used by Iran-backed Iraqi “shadow militias,” although ISW cannot confirm the militia’s association with Iran.

[22] “[The Ministry of Defense commented on the incident with the military of Russia and the United States in Syria,]” TASS, August 27, 2020

https://tass((.))ru/politika/9301435

[23] Warjournal, Telegram, https://t.me/warjournal/7504

[24] “Syria war: American troops hurt as Russian and US military vehicles collide,” BBC News, August 29, 2020, https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-53930795#:~:text=Video%20of%20the%20collision%20was,the%20US%20obstructed%20a%20patrol.

[25] “[The Ministry of Defense commented on the incident with the military of Russia and the United States in Syria,]” TASS, August 27, 2020

https://tass((.))ru/politika/9301435

[26] Eric Schmitt, “US – Russia Military Tensions Intensify in the Air and on the Ground Worldwide,” New York Times, September 1, 2020, https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/01/us/politics/us-russia-military-tensions.html; Barbara Starr and Ryan Brown, “Multiple US Troops injured in a Collision with a Russian Military Convoy in Syria,” CNN Politics, August 26, 2020, https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/26/politics/us-service-members-injured-russia-syria/index.html

[27]  Bradley Hanlon, “Weak US Response to Russian Proxies Undermines Deterrence in Middle East and Eastern Europe,” Institute for the Study of War, February 16, 2018, http://www.iswresearch.org/2018/02/weak-us-response-to-russian-proxies.html

Jennifer Cafarella and Matti Suomenaro, “Russia and Iran Prepare Offensive Targeting US and Partner Forces in Eastern Syria,” Institute for the Study of War, June 25, 2018, http://www.iswresearch.org/2018/06/russia-and-iran-prepare-offensive.html

Oula al Rifai and Ali Alleile, “Russian-Iranian Tensions in Deir al-Zour,” The Washington Institute for Near East Policy, September 4, 2020, https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/view/russian-iranian-tensions-in-deir-al-zour

[28] Aria Bendix, “US Carries Out Another Airstrike in Syria,” The Atlantic, June 6, 2017, https://www.theatlantic.com/news/archive/2017/06/us-carries-out-another-airstrike-in-syria/529380/

Barbara Starr and Hamdi al Khshali, “Syrian warplane shot down by US jet,” CNN, June 19, 2017, https://www.cnn.com/2017/06/18/middleeast/syrian-warplane-shot-down-coalition/index.html

[29] Bradley Hanlon, “Weak US Response to Russian Proxies Undermines Deterrence in Middle East and Eastern Europe,” Institute for the Study of War, February 16, 2018, http://www.iswresearch.org/2018/02/weak-us-response-to-russian-proxies.html

[30] “Unprovoked attack by Syrian pro-regime forces prompts Coalition defensive strikes,” CJTF-OIR, February 8, 2018, https://www.centcom.mil/MEDIA/PRESS-RELEASES/Press-Release-View/Article/1435188/unprovoked-attack-by-syrian-pro-regime-forces-prompts-coalition-defensive-strik/

[31] Jennifer Cafarella and Matti Suomenaro, “Russia and Iran Prepare Offensive Targeting US and Partner Forces in Eastern Syria,” Institute for the Study of War, June 25, 2018, http://www.iswresearch.org/2018/06/russia-and-iran-prepare-offensive.html

“[The Regime Advances in American partner-controlled areas in Deir ez-Zour,]” Zaman al Wasl, April 29, 2018, https://www.zamanalwsl.net/news/article/86759/

“[SDF reoccupies villages taken by the Syrian Arab Army in rural eastern Deir ez-Zour,]” Masrawy, April 29, 2018, https://www.masrawy.com/news/news_publicaffairs/details/2018/4/29/1335793/%D9%82%D8%B3%D8%AF-%D8%AA%D8%B3%D8%AA%D8%B9%D9%8A%D8%AF-%D9%82%D8%B1%D9%89-%D9%85%D9%86-%D9%82%D9%88%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AC%D9%8A%D8%B4-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B3%D9%88%D8%B1%D9%8A-%D9%81%D9%8A-%D8%B1%D9%8A%D9%81-%D8%AF%D9%8A%D8%B1-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B2%D9%88%D8%B1-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B4%D8%B1%D9%82%D9%8A

[Regime Forces Attack SDF and Control some Villages in Western Deir ez-Zour,]” El Dorar, April 29, 2018, https://eldorar.com/node/121550

[32] ”[British Newspaper Discovers Airstrike targeting Syrian Army,]” Sputnik News Arabic, July 2, 2018, https://arabic.sputniknews.com/arab_world/201807021033471364-%D8%B5%D8%AD%D9%8A%D9%81%D8%A9-%D8%A8%D8%B1%D9%8A%D8%B7%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D8%B3%D9%88%D8%B1%D9%8A%D8%A7-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AC%D9%8A%D8%B4-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B3%D9%88%D8%B1%D9%8A-%D8%A8%D8%B1%D9%8A%D8%B7%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%8A%D8%A7-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AA%D9%86%D9%81-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AA%D8%AD%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%81-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AF%D9%88%D9%84%D9%8A/

[33] Mais Nour al Din, “[Special Source Reveals Leader in Sanadid Force’s Visit to Russian Base in Latakia,]” Smart News Agency, February 17, 2019, https://smartnews-agency.com/ar/wires/364522/%D9%85%D8%B5%D8%AF%D8%B1-%D8%AE%D8%A7%D8%B5-%D9%8A%D9%83%D8%B4%D9%81-%D8%B9%D9%86-%D8%B2%D9%8A%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%A9-%D9%82%D8%A7%D8%A6%D8%AF-%D9%82%D9%88%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B5%D9%86%D8%A7%D8%AF%D9%8A%D8%AF-%D9%84%D9%84%D9%82%D8%A7%D8%B9%D8%AF%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B1%D9%88%D8%B3%D9%8A%D8%A9

Jamlyyyyy, Twitter, February 17, 2019, https://twitter.com/jamlyyyyy/status/1097836750070784000

[34] Ketti Davidson, “Forecast: the Consequences of the US Withdrawal from Syria,” Institute for the Study of War, October 13, 2019, http://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/forecast-consequences-us-withdrawal-syria

[35] Mohammad Hassan, “Arab Tribes in al-Hasakah and Deir ez-Zor Choose Their Allies,” Chatham House, January 2020

https://syria.chathamhouse.org/research/arab-tribes-in-al-hasakah-and-de....

[36] Amer Yasser Hamou, “[Deir ez-Zour: Conflict over Limited Alternatives to Fill the American Gap,]” Syria Direct, October 27, 2019, https://syriadirect.org/ar/news/%D8%AF%D9%8A%D8%B1-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B2%D9%88%D8%B1-%D8%B5%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%B9-%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%89-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A8%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%A6%D9%84-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%AD%D8%AF%D9%88%D8%AF%D8%A9-%D9%84%D9%85/

[37] “[US harvests foreign oil,]” Russia Today, August 2, 2020, https://arabic.rt.com/press/1140997-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%88%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%8A%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%AA%D8%AD%D8%AF%D8%A9-%D8%AA%D8%AC%D9%86%D9%8A-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%86%D9%81%D8%B7-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%BA%D8%B1%D9%8A%D8%A8/; “[The Syrian Tribes support “Popular Uprising” in Deir ez-Zour and call for a fight against the occupiers in the north,]” RT Arabic, August 20, 2020,  https://arabic.rt.com/middle_east/1146228-%D8%A8%D9%8A%D8%A7%D9%86-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%82%D8%A8%D8%A7%D9%8A%D9%84-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B3%D9%88%D8%B1%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D8%AF%D8%B9%D9%85-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%AA%D9%81%D8%A7%D8%B6%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B4%D8%B9%D8%A8%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D9%81%D9%8A-%D8%AF%D9%8A%D8%B1-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B2%D9%88%D8%B1-%D9%88%D8%AF%D8%B9%D9%88%D8%A9-%D9%84%D9%85%D8%AD%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%A8%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%AD%D8%AA%D9%84%D9%8A%D9%86-%D9%81%D9%8A-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B4%D9%85%D8%A7%D9%84/

[38] Jennifer Cafarella and Matti Suomenaro, “Russia and Iran Prepare Offensive Targeting US and Partner Forces in Eastern Syria,” Institute for the Study of War, June 25, 2018, http://www.iswresearch.org/2018/06/russia-and-iran-prepare-offensive.html

Oula al Rifai and Ali Alleile, “Russian-Iranian Tensions in Deir al-Zour,” The Washington Institute for Near East Policy, September 4, 2020, https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/view/russian-iranian-tensions-in-deir-al-zour

[Deir ez-Zour Media Center,] Facebook, https://www.facebook.com/Alialigma/posts/3503602902985531/

[39] Wladimir van Wilgenburg, “Syrian Arab province pleased with continued US presence: Deir al-Zor Civil Council,” Kurdistan 24, March 4, 2019,

http://www.kurdistan24.net/en/news/0e981691-30d5-4d05-a028-62bdfd6572a7

[40] Ahmed Hamza, “[Iranian Expansion in Deir ez-Zour: Economic, Social, and Strategic Dreams,]” al Araby al Jadeed, April 15, 2019,

https://www.alaraby.co.uk/%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AA%D9%88%D8%B3%D8%B9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A5%D9%8A%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%8A-%D9%81%D9%8A-%D8%AF%D9%8A%D8%B1-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B2%D9%88%D8%B1-%D8%A3%D8%AD%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%85-%D8%A7%D9%82%D8%AA%D8%B5%D8%A7%D8%AF%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D9%88%D8%A7%D8%AC%D8%AA%D9%85%D8%A7%D8%B9%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D9%88%D8%A7%D8%B3%D8%AA%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%AA%D9%8A%D8%AC%D9%8A%D8%A9

[41] “[150 Syrian tribes and clans join the opposition Higher Council for Syrian Tribes and Clans,]” Shaam Network, December 21, 2018,

http://www.shaam.org/news/syria-news/150-%D9%82%D8%A8%D9%8A%D9%84%D8%A9-%D9%88%D8%B9%D8%B4%D9%8A%D8%B1%D8%A9-%D8%B3%D9%88%D8%B1%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D8%AA%D9%86%D8%B6%D9%85-%D9%84%D9%84%D9%85%D8%AC%D9%84%D8%B3-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A3%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%89-%D9%84%D9%84%D9%82%D8%A8%D8%A7%D8%A6%D9%84-%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D8%B4%D8%A7%D8%A6%D8%B1-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B3%D9%88%D8%B1%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%B9%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%B6%D8%A9.html

[42] Oula al Rifai and Ali Alleile, “Russian-Iranian Tensions in Deir al-Zour,” The Washington Institute for Near East Policy, September 4, 2020, https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/view/russian-iranian-tensions-in-deir-al-zour

Kyra Rauschenbach, “Iran’s entrenchment of strategic infrastructure in Syria threatens balance of deterrence in the Middle East,” Critical Threats Project, July 13, 2020, https://www.criticalthreats.org/analysis/irans-entrenchment-of-strategic-infrastructure-in-syria-threatens-balance-of-deterrence-in-the-middle-east

[43] Genevieve Casagrande, “Post-ISIS Insurgency Looms in Northern Syria,” Institute for the Study of War, November 7, 2017,

http://www.iswresearch.org/2017/11/post-isis-insurgency-looms-in-northern.html

[44] Eva Kahan, “Anti-ISIS Coalition Begins Losing Tribal Support in Syria,” Institute for the Study of War, August 20, 2020, http://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/anti-isis-coalition-begins-losing-tribal-support-syria

[45] Eva Kahan, “Anti-ISIS Coalition Begins Losing Tribal Support in Syria,” Institute for the Study of War, August 20, 2020, http://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/anti-isis-coalition-begins-losing-tribal-support-syria

[46] Eva Kahan, “Anti-ISIS Coalition Begins Losing Tribal Support in Syria,” Institute for the Study of War, August 20, 2020, http://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/anti-isis-coalition-begins-losing-tribal-support-syria

[47] “[4 Days after it started: the SDF finishes its security campaign in cities, towns, and villages of rural eastern Deir ez-Zour,]” SOHR, July 20, 2020,

https://www.syriahr.com/%d8%a8%d8%b9%d8%af-4-%d8%a3%d9%8a%d8%a7%d9%85-%d9%85%d9%86-%d8%a8%d8%af%d8%a7%d9%8a%d8%aa%d9%87%d8%a7-%d9%82%d8%b3%d8%af-%d8%aa%d9%86%d9%87%d9%8a-%d8%ad%d9%85%d9%84%d8%aa%d9%87%d8%a7-%d8%a7/389223/

[48] “[Arrests and Seige… Three days of the SDF’s security operation,]” Enab Baladi, July 19, 2020,

https://www.enabbaladi.net/archives/402414

“[SDF operation against ISIS targets opposition activists,]” al Modon, July 19, 2020,

https://www.almodon.com/arabworld/2020/7/19/%D8%AD%D9%85%D9%84%D8%A9-%D9%82%D8%B3%D8%AF-%D8%B6%D8%AF-%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B9%D8%B4-%D8%A3%D9%85-%D8%AA%D8%B5%D9%81%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D8%AD%D8%B3%D8%A7%D8%A8%D8%A7%D8%AA

[49] Pro-Turkish sources amplified #رجع الخاروف [Return of the Sheep], a pun on the campaign’s title [Deterrence of Terrorism] which claimed that SDF troops had stolen livestock from civilians during the Deterrence of Terrorism II operation. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bQT8ZTokOmw

[50] “[In the teeth of their campaign against the local residents… the SDF announces the arrest of an ISIS Emir in Deir ez-Zour,]” Shaam Network, July 20, 2020,

http://www.shaam.org/news/syria-news/%D9%81%D9%8A-%D8%AE%D8%B6%D9%85-%D8%AD%D9%85%D9%84%D8%AA%D9%87%D8%A7-%D8%B6%D8%AF-%D8%B3%D9%83%D8%A7%D9%86-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D9%86%D8%B7%D9%82%D8%A9-%D9%82%D8%B3%D8%AF-%D8%AA%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%86-%D8%A7%D8%B9%D8%AA%D9%82%D8%A7%D9%84-%D8%A3%D9%85%D9%8A%D8%B1-%D9%84%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B9%D8%B4-%D8%A8%D8%AF%D9%8A%D8%B1-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B2%D9%88%D8%B1.html

[51] Eva Kahan, “Anti-ISIS Coalition Begins Losing Tribal Support in Syria,” Institute for the Study of War, August 20, 2020, http://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/anti-isis-coalition-begins-losing-tribal-support-syria

[52] Eva Kahan, “Anti-ISIS Coalition Begins Losing Tribal Support in Syria,” Institute for the Study of War, August 20, 2020, http://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/anti-isis-coalition-begins-losing-tribal-support-syria

[53] Eva Kahan, “Anti-ISIS Coalition Begins Losing Tribal Support in Syria,” Institute for the Study of War, August 20, 2020, http://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/anti-isis-coalition-begins-losing-tribal-support-syria

[54] Eva Kahan, “Anti-ISIS Coalition Begins Losing Tribal Support in Syria,” Institute for the Study of War, August 20, 2020, http://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/anti-isis-coalition-begins-losing-tribal-support-syria

[55] Eva Kahan, “Anti-ISIS Coalition Begins Losing Tribal Support in Syria,” Institute for the Study of War, August 20, 2020, http://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/anti-isis-coalition-begins-losing-tribal-support-syria

[56] Eva Kahan, “Anti-ISIS Coalition Begins Losing Tribal Support in Syria,” Institute for the Study of War, August 20, 2020, http://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/anti-isis-coalition-begins-losing-tribal-support-syria

[57] Julian E. Barnes and Eric Schmitt, “Trump Orders Withdrawal of US Troops from Northern Syria,” The New York Times, October 13, 2019, https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/13/us/politics/mark-esper-syria-kurds-turkey.html

[58] Tom Bowman and Marisa Penaloza, “US Forces in Syria Tackle a More Complex – and Possibly Dangerous – Mission,” NPR, March 26, 2020, https://www.npr.org/2020/03/26/821379862/u-s-forces-in-syria-tackle-a-more-complex-and-possibly-dangerous-mission

[59] Katie Bo Williams, “Biden: Trump’s ‘Subservice’ to Putin is ‘Humiliating’ to the US,” Defense One, August 31, 2020, https://www.defenseone.com/policy/2020/08/biden-trumps-subservience-putin-humiliating-us/168115/

[60] Jared Szuba, “Russian major general killed in roadside bomb in Syria’s Deir ez-Zor,” al Monitor, August 21, 2020,

https://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2020/08/syria-russia-general-killed-isis.html

www.marebpress.net/newsdetails.php?lngarabicsid166729

[61] “[Crowds of Fifth Corps Enter Deir ez-Zour,]” Syria PC, August 21, 2020, https://syrianpc.com/2020/08/%d8%ad%d8%b4%d9%88%d8%af%d8%a7%d8%aa-%d8%b9%d8%b3%d9%83%d8%b1%d9%8a%d8%a9-%d9%84%d9%84%d9%81%d9%8a%d9%84%d9%82-%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%ae%d8%a7%d9%85%d8%b3-%d8%aa%d8%af%d8%ae%d9%84-%d8%af%d9%8a%d8%b1-%d8%a7/

[62] “[Syrian and Russian Efforts to built a bridge in Deir ez-Zour,]” RT Arabic, June 10, 2019,

https://arabic(.)rt.com/features/1049656-%D8%AC%D9%87%D9%88%D8%AF-%D8%B3%D9%88%D8%B1%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D8%B1%D9%88%D8%B3%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D9%84%D8%A5%D9%86%D8%B4%D8%A7%D8%A1-%D8%AC%D8%B3%D8%B1-%D8%A8%D8%AF%D9%8A%D8%B1-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B2%D9%88%D8%B1/
Jennifer Cafarella and Matti Suomenaro, “Russia and Iran Prepare Offensive Targeting US and Partner Forces in Eastern Syria,” Institute for the Study of War, June 25, 2018, http://www.iswresearch.org/2018/06/russia-and-iran-prepare-offensive.html

[63] “Floating Bridge Across Euphrates River Opened,” The Syrian Observer, October 29, 2019,

https://syrianobserver.com/EN/news/53912/floating-bridge-across-euphrates-river-opened.html

[64] Oula al Rifai and Ali Alleile, “Russian-Iranian Tensions in Deir al-Zour,” The Washington Institute for Near East Policy, September 4, 2020, https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/view/russian-iranian-tensions-in-deir-al-zour

[65] [Deir ez-Zour Media Center,] Facebook, https://www.facebook.com/Alialigma/posts/3503602902985531/

[66] Oula al Rifai and Ali Alleile, “Russian-Iranian Tensions in Deir al-Zour,” The Washington Institute for Near East Policy, September 4, 2020, https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/view/russian-iranian-tensions-in-deir-al-zour

[67] “[Rapprochement between two representatives, American and Russian, in Syria… Text of the agreement between the SDC and People’s Will Party,]” Enab Baladi, August 31, 2020,

https://www.enabbaladi.net/archives/412552

[68] SSNP News, Twitter, October 15, 2018, https://twitter.com/SSNPNews/status/1051938591448948736?s=19

[69] Amberin Zaman,“Intel: Syrian Kurds court Moscow to avert potential Turkish attack,”  al Monitor, September 2, 2020, https://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2020/09/syria-kurds-sdf-court-moscow-turkey-attack-russia-regime.html

[70] “[On the Visit of the Deputy Prime Minister of the Russian Federation Yuri Borisov and the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Russia,]” Ministry of Defense, September 7, 2020, https://www.mid.ru/ru/foreign_policy/news/-/asset_publisher/cKNonkJE02Bw/content/id/4323056

[71] ”[Local source clarifies truth in Aqidat tribe announcements in Syria,]” RT Arabic, August 4, 2020,

https://arabic.rt.com/middle_east/1141179-%D9%85%D8%B5%D8%AF%D8%B1-%D9%85%D8%AD%D9%84%D9%8A-%D9%8A%D9%88%D8%B6%D8%AD-%D8%AD%D9%82%D9%8A%D9%82%D8%A9-%D8%A8%D9%8A%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D9%82%D8%A8%D9%8A%D9%84%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D9%83%D9%8A%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D9%81%D9%8A-%D8%B3%D9%88%D8%B1%D9%8A%D8%A7/

[72] Mustafa al Khalil, “[A Raqqa Sheikh Accuses Outside actors of trying to divide Deir ez-Zour,]” North Press Alliance Syria, August 6, 2020,

https://npasyria(.)com/blog.php?id_blog=11819&sub_blog=10&name_blog=%D8%A3%D8%AD%D8%AF%20%D8%B4%D9%8A%D9%88%D8%AE%20%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B1%D9%82%D8%A9%20%D9%8A%D8%AA%D9%87%D9%85%20%D8%AC%D9%87%D8%A7%D8%AA%20%D8%AE%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%AC%D9%8A%D8%A9%20%D8%A8%D9%85%D8%AD%D8%A7%D9%88%D9%84%D8%A9%20%D8%AE%D9%84%D9%82%20%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%81%D8%AA%D9%86%20%D9%81%D9%8A%20%D8%AF%D9%8A%D8%B1%20%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B2%D9%88%D8%B1

[73] “[Confrontation between SDF and civilians after an attempt to arrest a leader in Deir ez-Zour,]” al Araby, August 16, 2020, https://www.alaraby.co.uk/%D9%85%D9%88%D8%A7%D8%AC%D9%87%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D8%A8%D9%8A%D9%86-%22%D9%82%D8%B3%D8%AF%22-%D9%88%D9%85%D8%AF%D9%86%D9%8A%D9%8A%D9%86-%D8%A8%D8%B9%D8%AF-%D9%85%D8%AD%D8%A7%D9%88%D9%84%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D8%B9%D8%AA%D9%82%D8%A7%D9%84-%D9%82%D9%8A%D8%A7%D8%AF%D9%8A-%D9%81%D9%8A-%D8%AF%D9%8A%D8%B1-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B2%D9%88%D8%B1; “[Tension in Busayra City, eastern Deir ez-Zour, after a house raid by an SDF patrol,]” SOHR, September 2, 2020, https://www.syriahr.com/%D8%AA%D9%88%D8%AA%D8%B1-%D9%81%D9%8A-%D9%85%D8%AF%D9%8A%D9%86%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A8%D8%B5%D9%8A%D8%B1%D8%A9-%D8%B4%D8%B1%D9%82%D9%8A-%D8%AF%D9%8A%D8%B1-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B2%D9%88%D8%B1-%D8%B9%D9%84/394739/

[74] “[SDF prepares new base in rural Deir ez-Zour… what’s the goal?]” Halab Today TV, September 1, 2020,

https://halabtodaytv.net/archives/156084?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=%25d9%2582%25d8%25b3%25d8%25af-%25d8%25aa%25d8%25ac%25d9%2587%25d8%25b2-%25d9%2585%25d9%2582%25d8%25b1%25d8%25a7%25d9%258b-%25d8%25ac%25d8%25af%25d9%258a%25d8%25af%25d8%25a7%25d9%258b-%25d9%2584%25d9%2587%25d8%25a7-%25d8%25a8%25d8%25b1%25d9%258a%25d9%2581-%25d8%25af%25d9%258a%25d8%25b1-%25d8%25a7%25d9%2584%25d8%25b2

[75] “[Assassinated Leader of the Aqidat Tribe Sheikh Mutsir al Hammud al Jedan al Hifl,]” Suriye Gundemi, August 27, 2020,

https://www.suriyegundemi.com/akaydat-asiretinin-suikastla-oeldueruelen-lideri-seyh-mutsir-el-hammud-el-ced-an-el-hifil

Possibly also [Raqqa Documentation Center,] Twitter, https://twitter.com/EVzGYm35GzsMd50

[76] “[150 Syrian tribes and clans join the opposition Higher Council for Syrian Tribes and Clans,]” Shaam Network, December 21, 2018,

http://www.shaam.org/news/syria-news/150-%D9%82%D8%A8%D9%8A%D9%84%D8%A9-%D9%88%D8%B9%D8%B4%D9%8A%D8%B1%D8%A9-%D8%B3%D9%88%D8%B1%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D8%AA%D9%86%D8%B6%D9%85-%D9%84%D9%84%D9%85%D8%AC%D9%84%D8%B3-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A3%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%89-%D9%84%D9%84%D9%82%D8%A8%D8%A7%D8%A6%D9%84-%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D8%B4%D8%A7%D8%A6%D8%B1-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B3%D9%88%D8%B1%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%B9%D8%A7%D8%B1%D8%B6%D8%A9.html

 

Tuesday, September 8, 2020

Warning: Lukashenko Expels Opposition Leaders to Support Kremlin Information Operation


September 8, 2020, 7:20 pm EDT

By George Barros and Mason Clark 

Belarusian authorities are holding Belarusian opposition leader Kolesnikova after a failed attempt to expel her to Ukraine following her abduction on September 7. Ukrainian officials confirmed Belarusian authorities “forcibly expelled” Ivan Kravtsov and Anton Rodnenkov – two of Kolesnikova’s staffers – to Ukraine on September 8.[1] Belarusian security personnel in civilian clothes abducted Kolesnikova, Rodnenkov, and Kravtsov in downtown Minsk on September 7.[2] Rodnenkov claimed Belarusian authorities decided to expel him and Kravtsov to Ukraine, rather than Poland or Lithuania, because they did not have passports with EU visas.[3] Kravtsov and Rodnenkov confirmed at a press conference in Kyiv on September 8 that they witnessed Kolesnikova destroy her passport while in Belarusian detention to avoid expulsion.[4]

Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko falsely claimed on September 8 Belarusian authorities detained Maria Kolesnikova at the Belarusian-Ukrainian border – not in Minsk – after she attempted to flee to Ukraine to meet her sister there.[5] Belarusian authorities falsely claimed Kolesnikova, Rodnenkov, and Kravtsov attempted to drive to Ukraine – where Belarusian authorities claim Rodnenkov and Kravtsov have Ukrainian residence permits – and that Rodnenkov and Kravtsov kicked Kolesnikova out of the car at the Belarusian border checkpoint.[6] Ukrainian authorities confirmed Kolesnikova did not arrive at the Ukrainian border checkpoint with Kravtsov and Rodenenkov.[7]

Lukashenko previously expelled Olga Kovalkova – a member of Lithuania-based opposition leader Svetlana Tikhanouskaya’s Coordination Council – to Poland on September 5. Kovalkova claimed Belarusian authorities expelled her to Poland on September 5 after threating her with indefinite detention if she remained in Belarus.[8] Belarusian authorities arrested Kovalkova on August 25 and extended her first 10-day arrest by an additional 15 days on September 3.[9]

Lukashenko likely continued his campaign to detain opposition organizers still active in Belarus on September 8. Tikhanouskaya’s headquarters announced that Tikhanouskaya staffer Antonina Kanovalova disappeared on September 8.[10] Kanovalova’s whereabouts are unknown as of this writing. Belarusian authorities may expel Kanovalova to Ukraine, Poland, or Lithuania, as they did Kovalkova, Kravtsov, and Rodnenkov.

Lukashenko is likely expelling Belarusian opposition leaders to disrupt opposition coordination and support the Kremlin’s information operation that NATO is waging a hybrid war against Belarus. Lukashenko may intend to disrupt the opposition’s ability to sustain large-scale protests by arresting or expelling all organizers still active in Belarus. However, Telegram channel NEXTA has largely organized mass protests without any presence in Belarus, and protests will likely continue. Lukashenko may have alternatively intended to intimidate the opposition through targeted expulsions, but likely could have done this more effectively by indefinitely detaining opposition leaders. Lukashenko may finally intend to amplify his framing of Western backing for a hybrid war to overthrow him by sending opposition leaders to European states. Rodnenkov’s claim Belarus only expelled him and Kravtsov to Ukraine because they lacked EU visas supports this framing.

Kolesnikova’s ostentatious decision to foil Lukashenko’s attempt to expel her was an act of courage and potentially based on confidence in receiving external support. Kolesnikova posed special risks to Lukashenko because she was the last prominent opposition leader active in Belarus and has demonstrated her effectiveness at organizing the opposition. She also has the clearest and strongest connections to Kremlin-amenable actors among prominent opposition leaders. Lukashenko may have attempted to expel her to disrupt any Kremlin efforts through her to negotiate a transition government or pursue constitutional changes. Kolesnikova’s resistance to her expulsion – unlike her staffers or Kovalkova – additionally singles her out. Kolesnikova has repeatedly demonstrated her courage and willingness to risk detention or harm by continuing to operate in Belarus after other opposition leaders fled or were detained. Her decision to destroy her passport disrupted Lukashenko’s desired framing that opposition leaders left Belarus by choice, making it clear she is being held by Lukashenko against her will and does not desire to leave the country. Kolesnikova may have taken the brave choice to act as a symbol for the opposition by risking indefinite detention – since Lukashenko cannot readily force her to leave Belarus without openly abandoning his framing of legality, which is an important component of Russian and Belarusian information and hybrid operations. Kolesnikova may alternatively have confidence – rightly or wrongly – that she will not be detained indefinitely or harmed too badly due to her prominence among the opposition or because she trusts that an external authority such as Putin will protect her and ensure her release.

Security personnel in green uniforms without insignia began to operate with regular marked Belarusian riot police in Minsk on September 8. Security personnel wearing unmarked green uniforms – initially reported as Belarusian riot police (OMON) in new uniforms – first appeared in Minsk on September 5.[11] The unidentified personnel may not be Belarusian OMON as initially reported. These personnel operated with OMON who wore their regular black uniforms with identifying insignia on September 8.[12] It remains unclear why Belarusian OMON would have changed their uniforms and removed identifying markings or why possible Belarusian OMON personnel are now sporting two different uniforms. The unidentified personnel are likely setting conditions for the appearance of Russian security personnel in similar unmarked uniforms, or may themselves be Russian personnel.

Lukashenko gave a prominent interview to four senior Kremlin propagandists in Minsk on September 8. RT Editor-in-Chief Margarita Simonyan, Pervy Kanal anchor Anton Vernitsky, Russia 1 anchor Yevgeny Rozhkov, and Moscow Speaks Editor-in-Chief Roman Babayan met Lukashenko for an interview on September 8.[13] Lukashenko said he does not rule out the possibility of early presidential elections but that elections are only possible after constitutional reforms.[14] Lukashenko said he would not resign from office because his supporters would be killed and only he is capable of protecting Belarus – a reiteration of Lukashenko’s unsubstantiated claims of a Western hybrid war against Belarus.[15] Lukashenko also claimed Russia will fall if Belarus does and that it is “impossible” to block Telegram channels that organize protests – a tactic Lukashenko accused US-backed centers in Poland and the Czech Republic of using to organizing protests against him.[16]

The Kremlin likely organized this interview to humanize Lukashenko and reaffirm the Kremlin’s framing of the protests as a Western hybrid war that targets Russia. Lukashenko claimed his police response, though heavy-handed at times, was necessary given the severity of the threat to Belarus.[17] Simonyan in particular praised Lukashenko’s successful efforts to extinguish a color revolution, advancing the Kremlin’s framing of the Belarus protests as a Western hybrid war eventually targeting Russia.[18]

The Kremlin denies it had or will have contact with the Belarusian Coordination Council on September 8. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said the Kremlin has had no contact with the Coordination Council and will not contact the Coordination Council on September 8.[19] The Kremlin likely has conducted some form of backchannel contact with Kolesnikova given her association with the Kremlin-linked Viktor Babariko. Babariko served as the chairman of Belgazprombank – the Belarusian branch of a bank owned by Russian gas giant Gazprom - from 2000 to May 2020.[20] The Kremlin will likely continue to downplay overt communication with the Belarusian opposition while leaving open the possibility of supporting an alternative to Lukashenko.

The Kremlin reiterated its desire for Belarusian constitutional reforms after Lukashenko detained Kolesnikova – who has voiced support for constitutional reforms. Peskov reiterated the Kremlin’s desire to begin a dialogue to discuss Belarusian constitutional reforms on September 8 – a policy the Kremlin has advocated since August 31.[21] Kolesnikova previously stated her openness to working with the Kremlin and expressed support for constitutional reforms.[22] ISW warned Belarusian constitutional reforms could present opportunities for the Kremlin to secure provisions granting Russia additional strategic basing rights in Belarus and provisions further institutionalizing the Union State.[23] Lukashenko may have detained Kolesnikova in order to disrupt Kremlin efforts to undermine Belarus’ sovereignty via constitutional amendments.

An unknown number of Russian and Serbian troops will arrive in Belarus on September 10 for prescheduled annual tactical joint exercises. The Belarusian Ministry of Defense (MoD) confirmed on September 8 the “Slavic Brotherhood 2020” counterterror exercises will be held in Brest on September 10-15.[24] The MoD stated up to 1,500 troops from Belarus, Serbia, and Russia will participate in the exercises.[25] Units from Belarus’ 38th Guards Air Assault Brigade are garrisoned in Brest and will likely participate in the exercise. Planning for these exercises have been underway since at least December 2019.[26]

Slavic Brotherhood 2020 is at least twice as large as the previous two iterations of the exercises in 2018 and 2019. Approximately 600 Russian, Belarusian, and Serbian troops participated in the Slavic Brotherhood 2019 exercises in Pancevo, Serbia, in June 2019 and approximately 700 Belarusian, Russian, and Serbian troops participated in Slavic Brother 2018 in Krasnodar, Russia, in June 2018.[27] The 2020 exercises may be larger due to a higher number of Belarusian troops’ participation given the Belarusian military’s mobilization to full combat readiness since August 18.[28]

ISW will continue monitoring the situation and providing updates.




[1] https://www.facebook.com/anton.gerashchenko.7/posts/3273700299383461; https://mvs.gov(.)ua/ua/news/33830_SHCHodo_peretinu_ukrainskogo_kordonu_gromadyanami_Respubliki_Bilorus.htm; https://dpsu.gov(.)ua/ua/news/SHCHodo-peretinu-ukrainskogo-kordonu-gromadyanami-Respubliki-Bilorus/?fbclid=IwAR3tP2QvZCfkik4ufGEJbQcxVzvAnQNRO2-RUBCtDINanjA__3ONFfjkHKM.

[2] https://news.tut((.))by/economics/699502.html.

[3] https://gordonua(.)com/news/worldnews/belorusskie-oppozicionery-rodnenkov-i-kravcov-ne-planiruyut-poluchat-politicheskoe-ubezhishche-v-ukraine-1517418.html.

[4] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VG3Rzg3M7jc&ab_channel=WorldLiveNews.

[5] https://strana(.)ua/news/288519-lukashenko-zajavil-chto-oppozitsionerka-kolesnikova-planirovala-pobeh-v-ukrainu-k-sestre-smi.html.

[6] https://t(.)me/gpkgovby/216.

[7] https://www.facebook.com/anton.gerashchenko.7/posts/3273700299383461; https://mvs.gov(.)ua/ua/news/33830_SHCHodo_peretinu_ukrainskogo_kordonu_gromadyanami_Respubliki_Bilorus.htm; https://dpsu.gov(.)ua/ua/news/SHCHodo-peretinu-ukrainskogo-kordonu-gromadyanami-Respubliki-Bilorus/?fbclid=IwAR3tP2QvZCfkik4ufGEJbQcxVzvAnQNRO2-RUBCtDINanjA__3ONFfjkHKM.

[8] https://www.voanews.com/europe/belarusian-opposition-activist-kovalkova-leaves-country-after-arrest.

[9] http://www.iswresearch.org/2020/09/warning-belarusian-opposition-begins.html.

[10] https://www.interfax(.)ru/world/725075; https://www.mk(.)ru/politics/2020/09/08/propala-doverennoe-lico-svetlany-tikhanovskoy-antonina-konovalova.html; https://www.fontanka.ru/2020/09/08/69460271/.

[11] http://www.iswresearch.org/2020/09/warning-security-personnel-in-green.html.

[12] https://twitter.com/Den_2042/status/1303385448723734529/photo/1.

[13] http://president.gov(.)by/ru/news_ru/view/intervjju-predstaviteljam-veduschix-rossijskix-smi-24489/; https://eng.belta(.)by/politics/view/russian-journalist-there-are-always-people-who-seek-to-utilize-protests-133266-2020/.

[14] https://www.themoscowtime(.)com/2020/09/08/belarus-leader-admits-to-staying-too-long-in-power-in-rt-interview-a71381; http://www.iswresearch.org/2020/09/warning-security-personnel-in-green.html; https://meduza(.)io/en/news/2020/09/08/lukashenko-reportedly-admits-to-russian-tv-journalist-that-maybe-he-s-overstayed-his-welcome-as-belarusian-president; http://president.gov(.)by/ru/news_ru/view/intervjju-predstaviteljam-veduschix-rossijskix-smi-24489/; https://belsat(.)eu/en/news/too-long-in-office-but-still-irreplaceable-lukashenka-interviewed-by-russian-media/; https://tass(.)com/world/1198533.

[15] https://www.themoscowtime(.)com/2020/09/08/belarus-leader-admits-to-staying-too-long-in-power-in-rt-interview-a71381; http://www.iswresearch.org/2020/09/warning-security-personnel-in-green.html; https://meduza(.)io/en/news/2020/09/08/lukashenko-reportedly-admits-to-russian-tv-journalist-that-maybe-he-s-overstayed-his-welcome-as-belarusian-president; http://president.gov(.)by/ru/news_ru/view/intervjju-predstaviteljam-veduschix-rossijskix-smi-24489/; https://belsat(.)eu/en/news/too-long-in-office-but-still-irreplaceable-lukashenka-interviewed-by-russian-media/; https://tass(.)com/world/1198533.

[16] https://www.themoscowtime(.)com/2020/09/08/belarus-leader-admits-to-staying-too-long-in-power-in-rt-interview-a71381; http://www.iswresearch.org/2020/09/warning-security-personnel-in-green.html; https://meduza(.)io/en/news/2020/09/08/lukashenko-reportedly-admits-to-russian-tv-journalist-that-maybe-he-s-overstayed-his-welcome-as-belarusian-president; http://president.gov(.)by/ru/news_ru/view/intervjju-predstaviteljam-veduschix-rossijskix-smi-24489/; https://belsat(.)eu/en/news/too-long-in-office-but-still-irreplaceable-lukashenka-interviewed-by-russian-media/; https://tass(.)com/world/1198533.

[17] https://www.themoscowtime(.)com/2020/09/08/belarus-leader-admits-to-staying-too-long-in-power-in-rt-interview-a71381; http://www.iswresearch.org/2020/09/warning-security-personnel-in-green.html; https://meduza(.)io/en/news/2020/09/08/lukashenko-reportedly-admits-to-russian-tv-journalist-that-maybe-he-s-overstayed-his-welcome-as-belarusian-president; http://president.gov(.)by/ru/news_ru/view/intervjju-predstaviteljam-veduschix-rossijskix-smi-24489/; https://belsat(.)eu/en/news/too-long-in-office-but-still-irreplaceable-lukashenka-interviewed-by-russian-media/.

[18] https://eng.belta(.)by/society/view/russia-today-chief-describes-interview-with-lukashenko-as-sincere-personal-133263-2020/.

[19] https://rg(.)ru/2020/09/08/peskov-zaiavil-ob-otsutstvii-kontaktov-moskvy-i-koordinacionnogo-soveta-belarusi.html.

[20] https://belsat(.)eu/en/news/banker-and-philanthropist-babaryka-may-stand-in-2020-presidential-election/; https://www.iswresearch.org/2020/08/warning-belarussian-opposition-reaches.html.

[21] https://rg(.)ru/2020/09/08/peskov-zaiavil-ob-otsutstvii-kontaktov-moskvy-i-koordinacionnogo-soveta-belarusi.html; https://tass.ru/politika/9329937.

[22] http://www.iswresearch.org/2020/08/warning-belarussian-opposition-reaches.html; https://www.iswresearch.org/2020/09/warning-kremlin-linked-belarusian.html; http://www.iswresearch.org/2020/08/warning-kremlin-information-operations.html; https://tass.ru/politika/9329937.

[23] http://www.iswresearch.org/2020/08/warning-kremlin-information-operations.html.

[24] https://eng.belta(.)by/society/view/slavic-brotherhood-2020-exercise-to-be-held-at-brestsky-training-range-in-belarus-133255-2020/; https://www.mil(.)by/ru/news/105823/.

[25] https://www.mil(.)by/ru/news/105823/.

[26] https://function.mil(.)ru/news_page/country/more.htm?id=12264631@egNews; https://regnum(.)ru/news/polit/2837915.html; http://www.vs(.)rs/en/news/1472F895256C11EABEE30050568F5424/discussions-on-military-cooperation-between-serbia-and-belarus.

[27] https://function.mil(.)ru/news_page/country/more.htm?id=12238560@egNews; https://ria(.)ru/20180628/1523582020.html.

[28] https://hromadske(.)ua/ru/posts/lukashenko-privel-armiyu-v-boevuyu-gotovnost-na-granice-s-es-v-nato-govoryat-chto-sily-ne-narashivayut-i-nikakoj-ugrozy-net; https://www.interfax(.)ru/world/722395.

Monday, September 7, 2020

Warning: Belarusian Security Forces Likely Kidnap Opposition Leader Kolesnikova

September 7 5:00pm EDT Belarus Update

By: Mason Clark 

Unidentified men abducted opposition leader Maria Kolesnikova and two of her staffers in Minsk on September 7. An unidentified group of masked men in civilian clothes abducted Kolesnikova and two of her staffers, Anton Rodnenkov and Ivan Kravtsov, using an unmarked van in downtown Minsk the morning of September 7.[1] The whereabouts of Kolesnikova and her staffers is currently unknown. Kolesnikova is a key member of the opposition Coordination Council and the last remaining Belarusian opposition leader active in-country.[2]

Lukashenko likely kidnapped Kolesnikova – rather than detaining her – to intimidate the opposition. Belarusian state media outlets are not reporting on Kolesnikova’s disappearance. The Belarusian Interior Ministry denied its involvement to international and Russian media and claimed to begin an investigation the evening of September 7.[3] Kremlin-run media outlets alternatively describe the incident as a “disappearance” or “kidnapping.”[4] Opposition leader Svetlana Tikanouskaya accused Belarusian authorities of kidnapping Kolesnikova to disrupt opposition planning.[5] ISW cannot independently verify the identity of Kolesnikova’s assailants. However, the unmarked men were likely Belarusian Interior Ministry personnel. Belarusian Interior Ministry personnel without insignia beat and detained protesters on September 6, and Belarusian police have previously formally detained opposition leaders.[6] Lukashenko’s likely decision to abduct Kolesnikova rather than formally detaining her, which would have equally disrupted her ability to coordinate the opposition, is likely an intimidation tactic against the opposition among other things. Opposition figures recently began publicly stating that they can expect to be arrested and held for a few days, suggesting that threats of arrest have lost their force.[7] Abduction and disappearance may re-introduce an element of terror-based deterrence that Lukashenko apparently seeks.

Lukashenko likely additionally targeted Kolesnikova to disrupt the Kremlin’s outreach to the opposition. Kolesnikova represents Viktor Babariko, a Russia-amenable presidential candidate detained by Lukashenko since June.[8] Kolesnikova has previously expressed a willingness to work with the Kremlin on a power transition in Belarus and has attempted to moderate protests. ISW has previously forecasted the Kremlin may attempt to dominate Belarus by supporting a transition leader – such as Babariko – it can control.[9] Lukashenko is scheduled to travel to Moscow for a meeting with Putin sometime this week. Lukashenko may have kidnapped Kolesnikova to send a message to Putin and disrupt Kremlin efforts to support an alternative to Lukashenko. Assuming Lukashenko was behind the abduction he might hope to regain some leverage with Putin through the threat of what he might compel Kolesnikova to say about Moscow’s role and plans in Belarus. Putin could decide to delay the announced meeting given this development, which might benefit Lukashenko by buying him more time to suppress the protests and delay Kremlin efforts to absorb Belarus. Such speculations must be tentative at this time given the paucity of available information. ISW will continue to update this assessment when and as more data become accessible.



[1] https://news.tut((.))by/economics/699502.html.

[2] https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/aug/11/belarus-opposition-candidate-lithuania-protests-svetlana-tikhanouskaya; https://www.voanews.com/europe/belarusian-opposition-activist-kovalkova-leaves-country-after-arrest.

[3] https://www.euronews.com/2020/09/07/belarusian-opposition-figure-maria-kolesnikova-missing-after-bystander-reports-abduction; https://tass((.))ru/mezhdunarodnaya-panorama/9390183; https://tass((.))ru/mezhdunarodnaya-panorama/9393927.

[4] https://ria((.))ru/20200907/kolesnikova-1576896902.html; https://tass((.))ru/mezhdunarodnaya-panorama/9391445.

[5] https://tass((.))ru/mezhdunarodnaya-panorama/9389843.

[6] http://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/warning-belarusian-security-forces-escalate-violence-against-protesters-large-protests.

[7] https://www.voanews.com/europe/belarusian-opposition-activist-kovalkova-leaves-country-after-arrest.

[8] http://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/warning-kremlin-linked-belarusian-opposition-leadership-threaten-further-fragment.

[9] http://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/warning-belarusian-opposition-reaches-out-kremlin.

Sunday, September 6, 2020

Warning: Belarusian Security Forces Escalate Violence against Protesters but Large Protests Continue

September 6, 2020, 5:00 pm EDT

By Mason Clark

Belarusian Interior Ministry personnel without insignia, possibly including Russians, seriously beat and detained protesters in Minsk on September 6. Around 15 men in civilian clothes carrying batons and body armor beat and detained protesters in Minsk at approximately 7:00 pm local time, after most protesters had begun to disperse.[1] The men, who bore no insignia, pursued protesters into a nearby café, later bringing the detained protesters to liveried police vehicles.[2] The men used significantly more violence than Belarusian security forces have since the first week of the protests, continuing to beat already unconscious protesters.

Belarusian media identified the leader of the group as Police Colonel Nikolai Karpenkov, the head of the Belarusian Interior Ministry’s office for Combating Organized Crime.[3] Belarusian media additionally identified one of the men as Andrey Karpov, who listed his home city as Saint Petersburg on Russian social media platform VK but resides in Vitebsk, Belarus.[4] Karpov’s VK account was deleted as of 9:30 pm Belarus time. The NEXTA Telegram channel published the Belarusian address and personal information of Karpenkov and Karpov.[5] ISW cannot independently verify the identities of the rest of the men and the scale of Russian involvement in this group. The evidence so far presented is too tenuous to support the assessment that Russian security personnel are taking direct part in violence against protesters.

Belarusian security forces in Minsk escalated their use of force against protesters compared with previous Sunday protests. Uniformed Belarusian security forces additionally dispersed and detained isolated groups of protesters throughout the day.[6] OMON riot police repeatedly pepper-sprayed protesters who attempted to approach the security cordon around the Presidential Palace in Minsk for the first time since protesters began focusing on the Presidential Palace on August 16th. [7] Security forces in Minsk did not directly confront large groups of protesters. The Belarusian interior ministry announced it detained “hundreds of protesters,” and independent organizations estimated security forces detained around 200 protesters on September 6.[8] Belarusian security forces have yet to equal the scale of violent force used against protesters in the first week after the August 9 Presidential election, however.

Tens of thousands of protesters marched in Minsk and around the country amid increased intimidation by security forces. The Belarusian Interior Ministry warned protesters “the number of squads and servicemen has been increased” and “special equipment” would be used to suppress protests the morning of September 6.[9] Belarusian police and interior ministry troops, using armored military vehicles for the second week in a row, deployed around Minsk’s Independence Square, Victory Park, and Presidential Palace – previous destinations of Sunday protests.[10] Belarusian authorities closed several metro stations in Minsk for the first time in a likely attempt to channel protester movement. [11] Protesters marched in several directions and did not concentrate in a single location en masse – though tens of thousands approached the Presidential Palace in the late afternoon. [12] Protests continued in every region of Belarus despite the increased security presence. [13]

Belarusian security forces continue to use escalated levels of force against protests in the strategic western city of Grodno. Belarusian security forces dispersed thousands of protesters in Grodno on September 6.[14] Belarusian security forces used more force, and challenged larger groups of protesters, in Grodno compared to the rest of the country on September 6.[15] Belarusian security forces and military deployments have focused on Grodno since mid-August. Grodno borders Lithuania and Poland, and was the site of the only major defection among local authorities to support protesters to date.[16] Lukashenko and the Kremlin likely prioritize maintaining security over Grodno due to its strategic location on the border of Poland and Lithuania – which Lukashenko and the Kremlin continue to claim are behind the protest movement. The Kremlin and Lukashenko will likely use Grodno as one of the coordinating points for any potential hybrid actions against Poland and Lithuania, and the deployment of Russian forces to Grodno would pose a major threat to NATO’s ability to defend the Baltic States.

Direct Russian intervention in Belarus is turning protesters against the Kremlin. Protesters in at least Minsk and Grodno displayed anti-Russian sentiment and signs on September 6.[17] Independent Belarusian media widely reported example signs, including “no Kremlin absorption of Belarus,” “the Kremlin betrayed Belarus,” and “down with Putashenko,” an amalgamation of Putin and Lukashenko’s names. The protests remain overwhelmingly focused on Lukashenko but are likely to increasingly focus on Russia as Kremlin involvement increases. ISW previously forecasted increasing Russian involvement in Belarus risked refocusing the protests on the Kremlin and disrupting the Kremlin’s efforts to consolidate control over Belarus.[18] Belarusian protests showed no anti-Russian sentiment until the Kremlin overtly pressured Lukashenko to integrate Belarus under Russian structures on September 3.[19]



[1] https://news.tut((.))by/economics/699444.html.

[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TZGgW6Oaepk&feature=youtu.be.

[3] https://news.tut((.))by/society/699459.html.

[4] https://t((.))me/nexta_live/10941.

[5] https://t((.))me/nexta_live/10946; https://t((.))me/nexta_live/10941.

[6] https://news.tut((.))by/economics/699444.html.

[7] https://news.tut((.))by/economics/699444.html.

[8] https://news.tut((.))by/society/699457.html.

[9] https://news.tut((.))by/economics/699444.html.

[10] https://news.tut((.))by/economics/699444.html.

[11] https://news.tut((.))by/economics/699444.html.

[12] https://news.tut((.))by/economics/699444.html.

[13] https://news.tut((.))by/economics/699444.html; https://tass((.))ru/mezhdunarodnaya-panorama/9383941.

[14] https://news.tut((.))by/economics/699444.html.

[15] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FERKhfdAmrY&feature=youtu.be; https://news.tut((.))by/economics/699444.html.

[16] http://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/warning-kremlin-begins-security-forces-support-lukashenko-following-regional-security.

[17] https://news.tut((.))by/economics/699444.html; https://twitter.com/franakviacorka/status/1302578919476989952?s=20.

[18] http://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/warning-moscow-claims-poland-lead-sponsor-belarusian-protests-minsk-calls-protests-.

[19] http://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/warning-belarusian-opposition-begins-first-anti-kremlin-shift-after-lukashenko-promises.

Saturday, September 5, 2020

Warning: Security Personnel in Green Uniforms without Insignia Appear in Minsk

September 5, 2020, 6:15 EDT

By George Barros

Security personnel wearing unmarked green uniforms appeared in Minsk for the first time on September 5. The personnel are reportedly Belarusian riot police (OMON) in new uniforms.[1] These personnel wear Russian-made Dozor body cameras – a model of cameras Russian police and interior forces as well as Belarusian OMON personnel use.[2] Belarusian OMON previously wore all black uniforms with identifying markings.[3] It is unclear why Belarusian OMON would have changed their uniforms and removed identifying markings. They could be setting conditions for the appearance of Russian security personnel in similar unmarked uniforms.

Belarusian authorities did not try to disperse the second consecutive Saturday Women’s march in Minsk on September 5. Approximately 10,000 women marched in Minsk and gathered on Independence Square on September 5.[4] The personnel in unmarked green uniforms and other Belarusian security forces deployed to Independence Square likely to intimidate the protesters but did not disperse or detain them.[5] Security forces had not detained any women protesters during the August 29 women’s march either.[6] Belarusian security forces detained at least two journalists covering protests in Minsk on September 5, however.[7] Belarusian women will likely continue to hold weekly Saturday marches.

Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko continues to target student protests. The personnel in unmarked green uniforms detained student protesters in Minsk on September 5.[8] Belarusian security forces have been detaining student protesters in Minsk since September 1.[9] Lukashenko will likely intensify targeted detentions of student protests.

Women protesters confronted Belarusian security forces. Women protesters surrounded unmarked police detention vans and shouted at them on September 5.[10] ISW observed that protesters began using swarm tactics against security forces to resist detentions on August 30.[11] Confrontations between protesters and security forces may escalate further – a risk ISW forecasted.[12]

Belarusian protesters began displaying foreign flags prominently for the first time. Women’s march participants displayed the flags of Poland, Ukraine, Lithuania, Latvia, Germany, Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom, the European Union, Spain, Italy, Sweden, Israel, Ireland, and Jamaica on September 5.[13] The prominent display of foreign flags by protesters is a new phenomenon, but the red and white Belarusian flag continues to dominate the demonstrations. Lukashenko and the Kremlin will likely use the presence of foreign flags in the protests in its information operation claiming that the protests are a Western color revolution and hybrid war against Belarus.[14]

A factory suffered an explosion in Zhlobin, Belarus. A fire caused an explosion at an art factory in Zhlobin on September 5.[15] It is unclear whether the fire was accidental or arson. Regional Belarusian authorities reported no casualties but have not provided information on the fire’s causes .[16] The Kremlin and/or Lukashenko may use this or similar incidents to justify a Russian intervention to “restore order” in Belarus.[17] The Kremlin confirmed on August 27 the existence of a Russian law enforcement officer reserve prepared to intervene in Belarus if the situation “gets out of control.”[18] Russian or Belarusian framing of this explosion as an act of terrorism would indicate an increased likelihood of Russian intervention.


Opposition leader Svitlana Tikhanouskaya backed the NEXTA Telegram channel’s call for large protests on September 6. Tikhanouskaya released a video on September 5 calling on Belarusians to participate in the planned September 6 unity march.[19] NEXTA first directed Belarusians to hold this march in a September 3 post.[20] Protesters will likely hold large protests near Independence Square and Independence Avenue in Minsk at 2:00 pm local time on September 6. Lukashenko militarized his response to the last large Sunday protest on August 30 with armored vehicles and will likely do so again.[21]

 

ISW will continue monitoring the situation and providing updates.


[1] https://twitter.com/HannaLiubakova/status/1302260831619624965; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xy1A-LtmgBA&ab_channel=TUT.BY.%D0%9F%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0; https://t(.)me/nexta_live/10704; https://twitter.com/vottak_tv/status/1302276885519499272

[2] https://twitter.com/MarQs__/status/1302199713240961027; https://sputniknews(.)com/russia/201503051019109855/; https://t(.)me/nexta_live/10704; https://twitter.com/Dodeskaden2/status/1299752096477126656/photo/4

[3] https://twitter.com/Dodeskaden2/status/1299752096477126656/photo/4; https://42.tut(.)by/696542

[4] https://news.tutby(.)news/society/699392.html; https://meduza(.)io/short/2020/09/05/v-minske-proshel-mnogotysyachnyy-zhenskiy-marsh-fotografiya; https://meduza(.)io/feature/2020/08/29/desyat-tysyach-zhenschin-proshli-marshem-po-tsentru-minska-omon-pytalsya-im-pomeshat-no-ne-smog

[5] https://twitter.com/tutby/status/1302259451324489728; https://www.interfax(.)ru/world/724731

[6] http://www.iswresearch.org/2020/08/warning-lukashenko-and-kremlin.html

[7] https://twitter.com/tutby/status/1302240623966257153

[8] https://twitter.com/HannaLiubakova/status/1302176936408625153; https://twitter.com/HannaLiubakova/status/1302194994774716416; https://twitter.com/franakviacorka/status/1302193212765937664; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xy1A-LtmgBA&ab_channel=TUT.BY.%D0%9F%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0

[9] http://www.iswresearch.org/2020/09/warning-kremlin-linked-belarusian.html; http://www.iswresearch.org/2020/09/warning-moscow-claims-poland-is-lead.html

[10] https://twitter.com/HannaLiubakova/status/1302248827165048832

[11] https://www.iswresearch.org/2020/08/warning-militarization-of-lukashenkos.html; https://twitter.com/BFreeTheatre/status/1302309923301339136

[12] https://www.iswresearch.org/2020/08/warning-militarization-of-lukashenkos.html

[13] https://twitter.com/franakviacorka/status/1302230796724514816; https://twitter.com/izvestia_ru/status/1302255213466791936/photo/1; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8pT6YSfYPbI&ab_channel=TUT.BY.%D0%9F%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0; https://twitter.com/tutby/status/1302233931169910784; https://twitter.com/PolScorr/status/1302232401591103490; https://twitter.com/PolScorr/status/1302237861236879362; https://twitter.com/franakviacorka/status/1302230796724514816; https://twitter.com/vottak_tv/status/1302245702618222597; https://twitter.com/izvestia_ru/status/1302255213466791936; https://twitter.com/tutby/status/1302233931169910784; https://twitter.com/tutby/status/1302258954945339393/photo/2;

[14] http://www.iswresearch.org/2020/09/warning-moscow-claims-poland-is-lead.html

[15] https://www.rbc(.)ua/rus/news/belarusi-proizoshel-vzryv-fabrike-1599311327.html

[16] https://newsgomel(.)by/news/incidents/masshtabnyy-pozhar-edva-ne-unichtozhil-fabriku-v-zhlobine_53467.html; https://sputnik(.)by/incidents/20200905/1045624803.html

[17] http://kremlin((.))ru/events/president/news/63951 ; https://www.iswresearch.org/2020/08/warning-kremlin-announces-reserve-force.html

[18] http://kremlin((.))ru/events/president/news/63951; https://www.iswresearch.org/2020/08/warning-kremlin-announces-reserve-force.html

[19] https://twitter.com/franakviacorka/status/1302289305788772352

[20] http://www.iswresearch.org/2020/09/warning-belarusian-opposition-begins.html

[21] https://www.iswresearch.org/2020/08/warning-militarization-of-lukashenkos.html

Friday, September 4, 2020

Warning: Moscow Claims Poland Is the Lead Sponsor of Belarusian Protests; Minsk Calls Protests a “Color Revolution”

September 4, 2020, 5:15 EDT

By George Barros

The Kremlin framed Poland as a leader in sponsoring Belarusian protests for the first time and Belarus claimed the ongoing protests are part of a Western-sponsored “color revolution.” The Russian Foreign Ministry (MFA) dedicated a segment of its September 3 briefing to accusing Warsaw of providing direct financial, NGO, and influence operation support to the Belarusian opposition and said Poland is “at the forefront of the EU's unfriendly policy.”[1] The Kremlin has not previously framed Poland as the leader of Western inference in Belarus, but rather as a coconspirator along with Lithuania, Germany, the Czech Republic, the United States, Ukraine, and Canada.[2] The Kremlin may be setting information conditions to conduct hybrid operations against Poland.[3]

The Kremlin and Lukashenko reiterated false claims that the protests are an attempt at a color revolution. Belarusian Defense Minister Viktor Khrenin participated in a prescheduled defense ministerial along with member states of the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO), and Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) in Moscow on September 4.[4] Khrenin said “color revolutions” are a major international security threat for the Kremlin-aligned block and used the current protests in Belarus as an example of an attempted but unsuccessful color revolution.[5] ISW assessed the Kremlin will likely deepen its military footprint in Belarus by exploiting the false narrative of external threats to the Union State.[6]

Belarusian security forces forcefully entered a university building to detain student protesters for the first time on September 4. Security forces detained students demonstrating in solidarity with students whom Belarusian security forces had previously detained in street protests on September 1.[7] Belarusian university administrators are cooperating with Belarusian security forces.[8] Student demonstrations are not displaying anti-Kremlin symbols.[9]

Protests in Minsk on September 4 were larger than usual weekday protests. A few hundred women formed an impromptu march in Minsk to protest student detentions in the evening of September 4.[10] Minsk residents demonstrated in a number of neighborhoods around the city as well.[11] These protests were larger than the usual weekday protest pattern. ISW did not observe anti-Kremlin symbols in posted media of these protests.

The Kremlin continues preparations for President Alexander Lukashenko’s upcoming summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow. The Kremlin said on September 4 that Lukashenko and Putin will discuss reopening the Russian-Belarusian border during their upcoming meeting in Moscow.[12] The Kremlin has not yet confirmed the date of their meeting but it will reportedly be around September 10.[13] ISW forecasted that Lukashenko may cede more of Belarus’ remaining sovereignty to Russia at this summit.[14]

The Kremlin’s decision to open the Russian-Belarusian border may enhance Moscow’s capabilities to infiltrate personnel into Belarus. The Kremlin closed Russia’s borders with Belarus as a COVID-19 precaution in March 2020.[15] Resumption of regular traffic between Russia and Belarus may provide the Kremlin cover to infiltrate personnel into Belarus. The Kremlin reportedly deployed at least 600 Russian riot control personnel to Pskov – 200 kilometers away from Belarus – on September 2.[16] The Kremlin confirmed on August 27 the existence of a Russian law enforcement officer reserve prepared to intervene in Belarus if the situation “gets out of control.”[17] ISW assessed unmarked vehicles may already be transporting Russian riot control personnel to Belarus on August 30.[18]

The Kremlin likely seeks to prevent the tone of the protests from becoming anti-Russian. Anti-Kremlin backlash from the Belarusian population would disrupt the Kremlin’s efforts to consolidate control over Belarus in the guise of voluntary Belarusian accession to the Union State mechanism. The Kremlin’s overt support for Lukashenko began pushing elements of the Belarusian opposition into an anti-Russian direction for the first time on September 3.[19] Belarusian protests remain overwhelming neutral on Russia as of this writing.

ISW will continue monitoring the situation and providing updates




[1] https://www.mid(.)ru/ru/foreign_policy/news/-/asset_publisher/cKNonkJE02Bw/content/id/4309873

[2] https://www.mid(.)ru/ru/foreign_policy/news/-/asset_publisher/cKNonkJE02Bw/content/id/4307068; https://ria(.)ru/20200901/belorussiya-1576566492.html

[3] https://www.iswresearch.org/2020/08/warning-moscow-sets-conditions-for.html

[4] https://www.mil(.)by/ru/news/105607/

[5] https://www.mil(.)by/ru/news/105607/

[6] http://www.iswresearch.org/2020/09/warning-kremlin-prepares-to-further.html

[7] https://twitter.com/HannaLiubakova/status/1301826859701800961; https://twitter.com/nexta_tv/status/1301838518415773696; https://twitter.com/BFreeTheatre/status/1301856224959434752; https://twitter.com/nexta_tv/status/1301872244709261318; https://twitter.com/BFreeTheatre/status/1301837953078091776; https://twitter.com/HannaLiubakova/status/1301855697324437504; https://twitter.com/VoicesBelarus/status/1301825461920694272;

http://www.iswresearch.org/2020/09/warning-belarusian-opposition-begins.html

[8] https://twitter.com/HannaLiubakova/status/1301855697324437504; https://twitter.com/HannaLiubakova/status/1301835757083131904; https://twitter.com/BFreeTheatre/status/1301864294641020928

[9] http://www.iswresearch.org/2020/09/warning-belarusian-opposition-begins.html

[10] https://twitter.com/BFreeTheatre/status/1301931199514972160

[11] https://t(.)me/nexta_live/10573; https://t(.)me/nexta_live/10567; https://t(.)me/nexta_live/10576; https://t(.)me/nexta_live/10582; https://t(.)me/nexta_live/10578; https://t.me/nexta_live/10575

[12] https://riafan(.)ru/1308357-rossiya-gotova-otkryt-granicu-s-belorussiei

[13] https://www.newsru(.)com/blog/02sep2020/mos_luk.html; https://dni(.)ru/polit/2020/9/2/458507.html; https://udf(.)by/news/main_news/217768-10-sentjabrja-belorusskij-prezident-priedet-v-moskvu-tam-budut-proishodit-jeti-samye-rokovye-peregovory.html

[14] http://www.iswresearch.org/2020/09/warning-kremlin-prepares-to-further.html

[15] https://www.bbc.com/russian/news-51904909; https://rg(.)ru/2020/03/18/reg-cfo/rossiia-vremenno-zakryla-granicu-s-belorussiej.html

[16] https://twitter.com/ErlikhmanK/status/1301208662774554625; http://www.iswresearch.org/2020/09/warning-belarusian-opposition-begins.html

[17] http://kremlin((.))ru/events/president/news/63951 ; https://www.iswresearch.org/2020/08/warning-kremlin-announces-reserve-force.html

[18] https://www.iswresearch.org/2020/08/warning-militarization-of-lukashenkos.html

[19] http://www.iswresearch.org/2020/09/warning-belarusian-opposition-begins.html