UA-69458566-1

Monday, May 4, 2015

Warning Intelligence Update: Possible Upheaval in the Syrian Capital

by: Jennifer Cafarella

Key Takeaway: Major operations targeting entrenched anti-Assad forces in the outskirts of Damascus appear to be upcoming as Hezbollah and the Syrian regime prepare to target anti-Assad hold out positions in the capital and its countryside. In addition, indicators have emerged of a possible intervention by regional actors to assist in defeating Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. This includes ongoing negotiations to deepen the cooperation between prominent hardline Islamist groups Jaysh al-Islam and Harakat Ahrar al-Sham, which would increase the effectiveness of anti-Assad forces regardless of direct regional intervention. Together these trends indicate that a major shakeup of the military situation in Damascus Province is likely in coming weeks. 

The Syrian regime launched an attack on May 3 targeting the town of Maydaa, which buffers a crucial remaining rebel supply line into the partly besieged Eastern Ghouta suburbs of Damascus. The regime made immediate gains, but clashes are reportedly ongoing in the area. According to Damascus-based Jaysh al-Islam commander Zahran Alloush, “if the army succeeds in taking Maydaa they could use it as a launchpad to storm Eastern Ghouta.” It therefore appears that the Assad regime may be setting conditions for a major campaign inside of the capital. Following the attack, conflicting reports indicate that either multiple IEDs or a suicide bomber detonated inside the Rukn al-Din neighborhood of Damascus on May 4, injuring a regime major general. The Rukn al-Din neighborhood is home to a number of senior regime officials and elements of Syria’s intelligence apparatus. Jabhat al-Nsura (JN) later claimed via twitter that three JN fighters successfully penetrated a military logistics and supply building on Barniya Street near the neighborhood, likely in the same attack that killed the regime general. This attack could be an attempt by JN disrupt the regime’s operation in Eastern Ghouta.

The attack also indicates JN’s ability to penetrate core regime-held neighborhoods with spectacular attacks. If anti-Assad strongholds in the eastern outskirts of the capital begin to fall, JN could attempt to force a constriction in the regime’s deployment in the capital through spectacular attacks targeting core regime-held terrain. Seeming to indicate this threat, unconfirmed reports emerged from a Saudi newspaper that the regime's intelligence service asked all of the “top families” of Damascus to relocate to Latakia city within 48 hours on May 3, 2015. According to the report, the regime has specifically asked the families of the Mezzeh district to abandon the city. The Mezzeh Military Airbase is one of Assad’s primary airports to support its operations in Damascus, and is located less than five miles from the Presidential Palace, making the Mezzeh district some of the regime’s most fortified terrain.

The possibility of a regional intervention by Saudi Arabia and Turkey to support Damascus-based rebels may encourage the regime to secure immediate gains in the capital that could neutralize opportunities for regional actors. Indications of a possible Saudi and Turkish intervention in Syria against Assad have increased in recent weeks. Following the fall of Idlib City and Jisr al-Shughour in Idlib Province to JN and rebel forces, reports emerged of increased amounts of regional aid being delivered to rebels in northern Syria. In addition, major rebel groups in southern Syria claimed in late April to have engaged in discussions with regional actors regarding the provision of Arab air cover or other anti-aircraft capabilities to Syrian opposition fighters for an upcoming operation against the regime, likely in southern Damascus and Dera’a Provinces. Zahran Alloush, the leader of the Saudi-backed Jaysh al-Islam, is currently in Turkey after arriving on April 17 for a series of undisclosed meetings. According to photos circulated by pro-opposition sources, Alloush recently met with leaders from hardline Islamist group Harakat Ahrar al-Sham al-Islamiya (HASI). The discussions underway in Turkey reportedly constitute an attempt by these two groups to negotiate a new cooperative relationship, likely under Saudi and Turkish supervision. A member of the Islamic Front Shura Council denied that the groups were considering a full merger but indicated that deepening cooperation between the groups is upcoming.


From left to right: HASI leader Hassem Sheikh, Jaysh al-Islam leader Zahran Alloush, and Suqour al-Sham (HASI’s armed wing) leader Sheikh Ahmed Issa
Photo distributed by All4Syria, May 2, 2015

A united HASI and Jaysh al-Islam could provide regional actors with a powerful ally on the ground to serve as a partner for action against the Assad regime in the near term. An apparent recent increase in Jaysh al-Islam’s military capabilities seems to indicate that regional support to the group has actually increased in the past few months. This augmentation seems to confirm that the group will be a designated partner for any future operations directly carried out by regional actors against the Syrian regime. In mid-April, Jaysh al-Islam conducted a large military parade and graduation ceremony in the Eastern Ghouta suburbs of Damascus. The scope of the parade and the equipment showcased suggest a recent infusion of increased support, likely from Saudi Arabia. Some of these newly trained fighters appear to have participated in the battle to seize Jisr al-Shughour in Idlib Province. Jaysh al-Islam was a signatory to the “Battle of Victory” operations room, which seized the town on April 25. Jaysh al-Islam also signed onto a new operations room in Aleppo City the following day, a notable expansion of its operations inside Aleppo that could signify Jaysh al-Islam’s growing role as a cross-front actor in Syria. 

Meanwhile, unconfirmed Lebanese sources are also indicating that Hezbollah’s expected offensive targeting the Qalamoun border region with Syria is imminent and “could start in hours.”  According to “field sources” cited by the Lebanese paper Janoubiya on May 3, a large number of Shi’a youth have traveled from villages in the western Bekaa Valley to the Northern Bekaa region to prepare for the “Battle of Spring” in Qalamoun, which is expected to begin in the next 48 hours. Jihadists in the border region also appear to be gearing up for upcoming operations, likely indicating that a battle in the border region will require a significant military effort from Hezbollah. JN released a series of photos from the Qalamoun region showing its fighters training on a variety of anti-tank weapons systems. The tweets follow a set of earlier pictures from a graduation ceremony from a JN training camp. One of these tweets stated that “[the mujahideen] are almost ready to free their villages,” likely indicating upcoming JN offensive operations in the border region. JN and rebel fighters in the Qalamoun region launched a surprise assault against Hezbollah and Syrian regime positions in the Zabadani area and the Tfeil enclave on May 4, possibly indicating the start of a JN-led campaign in the border region.


A JN trainer instructs JN fighters using anti-tank weapon
Photo distributed by JN via Twitter May 2, 2015

It is unclear if the Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) will be able to maintain security in Lebanon’s bordering Bekaa valley if a major Qalamoun offensive occurs. Lebanese Speaker of Parliament Nabih Berri indicated that he supports the upcoming Hezbollah offensive and that the LAF will continue to respond to jihadist activity on the Lebanese side of the border in case of escalation. With Hezbollah’s backing, the LAF and Lebanese General Security have made a string of important arrests that appear to be dismantling the jihadist network inside Lebanon. However, jihadist actors in the Qalamoun, including both JN and ISIS, have dormant strength in the Bekaa Valley and will likely leverage this to escalate on both sides of the Lebanese-Syrian border.

Assad is likely to calculate his activities in Damascus in the context of the security of key regime supply lines transiting the Damascus countryside from Lebanon. Escalation in both the capital and its countryside could result in dangerous destabilization that could jeopardize the continued security of key regime terrain in the capital, such as that represented by the Mezzeh district. Yet a combined regime and Hezbollah assault against anti-Assad hold out positions in both Damascus and the Qalamoun region could also achieve a major victory and reestablish the military superiority of pro-regime forces in Syria. Regional actors are likely to engage with this dynamic and calculate the possibilities and prospects of intervention according to the realities of the military situation in the province. Jaysh al-Islam and HASI will be key players in rebel activities in Damascus province regardless of whether intervention materializes.

Tuesday, April 28, 2015

Syria Situation Report: April 20-28, 2015

By: Christopher Kozak

Iraq’s Prime Minister comes under Attack by Political Rivals

By Sinan Adnan

Iraq's Prime Minister (PM) Haidar al-Abadi and Defense Minister Khalid al-Ubaidi came under increasing political pressure from former Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki’s allies and select Shi'a militia leaders this week. Pro-Maliki social media levied criticisms in posts between April 24 and April 27, 2015. ISIS's successful attack against an Iraqi Army outpost in eastern Anbar provided the proximate cause for the criticism, allowing political opponents to target Abadi and Ubaidi for what they described as poor performance of the government in managing the security portfolio. ISIS's recent gain in Anbar, while tactically important, is still relatively small given the overall success of the Iraqi Security Forces operation that cleared ISIS from Tikrit. It nevertheless showed that ground ISF units in Anbar are arrayed to address various high priorities such as the defense of Ramadi, preventing them from launching a successful ground rescue operation. Shi'a political rivals are likely targeting Abadi not only to make political gains, but also because of his recent cooperation with the U.S., which angered politicians affiliated with Iranian-backed Iraqi Shi’a militias. Maliki has recently staged himself as a senior figure within the sphere of the militias by attending militia-sponsored events and funerals of senior militia figures. This outreach to the militias may indicate that he is setting conditions whereby he can break off militia-supportive elements of the Shi'a coalition that supports the current PM and challenge current Prime Minister Abadi, who is a member of his own Dawa party. These events may increase political and social tension in Baghdad and Iraq’s Shi'a provinces at a vulnerable time.

During last week, ISIS reportedly besieged an IA outpost near the Thar Thar regulatory Dam, an area in the desert between Baghdad and Anbar province with historic foot print of anti-government militant groups. ISIS launched an attack on the base on April 24, 2015, initiating intense clashes with the ISF. The attack took place at a time when the ISF were advancing toward Garma, an area located northeast of Fallujah that is part of ISIS’s defense of Fallujah. The attack was likely meant to divert ISF resources in the area. Commander of the 1st IA division, which operates in eastern Anbar, Gen. Hassan Abas Tufan headed a force to reinforce the ISF at the outpost. ISIS then launched an attack on the force reportedly using four VBIEDs, killing the division commander along with the a Brigade commander. ISIS successfully expelled the IA forces from the outpost thereafter.

The acting AOC commander stated on April 25, 2015 that forces from the IA and Federal Police (FP) deployed to the area with Iraqi and Coalition air support to roll back ISIS’s advance. The Defense Minister stated on April 26, 2015 that ISIS remained in control of the regulatory dam, however, highlighting that the attack killed 13 individuals while seven others, who included members of the “Popular Mobilization” who fled the facility on April 25, 2015. Seven members were rescued on April 26, 2015 by an IA aviation force headed by the commander of the IA Aviation, Gen. Hamid al-Maliki. On April 27, Baghdad Operations Command (BOC) stated that it recaptured the regulatory dam. Official reports from the MoD and PM’s offices indicated that the casualty count from ISIS’s attack did not exceed 13 dead, but rumors circulated that the attack led to the death of more than a 100 ISF members. The inflated casualty count was broadcast by both ISIS supporters and political opponents of Abadi to attack his security record and that of the defense minister.

ISIS published a video on April 25, 2015 showing the aftermath of the attack on what appeared to be a Company Headquarters (HQ) near the regulatory dam and two bodies dressed in ISF attire. The footage also showed ISIS members posting an ISIS flag in the base and roaming the premises. Separate anti-government social media outlets recycled pictures of other corpses, alleging that they were from the recent attack, further claiming that ISIS captured dozens of ISF members. In addition, some local news sources quoted a local official from Anbar stating that ISIS executed 50 ISF members in Fallujah that were kidnapped earlier from the regulatory dam. Then reports circulated through pro-ISIS social media and other questionable sources that 140 ISF members were besieged in the base and that ISIS opened the Thar Thar dam to flood Baghdad. ISIS is known to plant such rumors in order to shape battlefield reactions in its favor. One week prior, ISIS supporters spread rumors between April 11 and April 17 east of Ramadi before an assault, indicating that ISIS was advancing using a force much bigger than it actually possessed, causing residents and Iraqi Police (IP) forces in and around Ramadi to vacate their homes and positions in fear of an ISIS massacre.

Pro-ISIS supporters were not the only ones broadcasting disinformation about ISIS’s attack in Thar Thar. Facebook pages of pro-Maliki supporters adopted Thar Thar as their case to undermine Abadi, describing what happened as the “Thar Thar massacre.” A Maliki ally who currently heads her own political party, Hanan al-Fatlawi attacked PM Abadi and the defense minister and highlighted that she is preparing for a questioning session of the minister at the Council of Representatives (CoR). Also, head of the State of Law Alliance in the CoR, Ali al-Adib called for the defense minister to attend the CoR to explain what happened at Thar Thar. Another Maliki ally, Alya Nsayef called for the resignation of the defense minister. Asa’ib Ahl al-Haq, an Iranian backed organization also stated that 140 ISF members were killed in Thar Thar and criticized the government for not acting promptly to support the forces at Thar Thar to stop the massacre. Highlighting one dimension of this issue, member of the Mowatin bloc of ISCI, Falih al-Sari highlighted that members within the National Alliance stand behind this recent media campaign against the PM and added that a “known personality,” likely a reference to Nouri al-Maliki, is behind this media effort that “dreams of heading the government again.”

The criticism culminated on April 28, 2015 when the CoR hosted the defense mister. The session was also attended by the PM and other senior security leaders. The speaker of the CoR declared the session secret. Despite the secret nature of the session, it will almost certainly include a broader discussion beyond the events of Thar Thar. Political opponents, especially those affiliated with militias like Badr and allies of VP Maliki, will likely use the session to voice their discontent with the PM. This political escalation will likely have polarizing effects within the CoR in a way that can hinder the work of the government.

Iraqi society has become neuralgic to events that result in the death of besieged ISF members especially after the killing of hundreds of ISF members that were besieged in Camp Speicher following the fall of Tikirt in June 2014. The reports of a massacre in Thar Thar resulted in public protests in Baghdad and Najaf that were likely genuine. It is also likely that Abadi opponents contributed to the organization of these protests, especially since the protest in Najaf called for the dismissal of the both, the PM and the defense minister.

Iranian-backed militias themselves also have reason to undermine the PM at this time. The recent coordination between Iraq and the U.S. that sidelined the Iranian backed-Iraqi Shi’a militias has generated a push back from Iranian allies in Iraq. Kata’ib Hezbollah (KH), a longstanding Iranian proxy group released four statements between April 21 and 27, 2015 attacking the Iraqi government and the PM for what it described as poor management of the security portfolio and heavy reliance on the U.S. KH distanced itself from what it described as agreements between the “head of authority and leaders in the Popular Mobilization” and indicated that it will withdraw from its fighting position near Baghdad and never participate in future operation as a demonstration against government policies.

It is unlikely that this campaign to challenge PM Abadi will achieve substantial results such as the dismissal of the defense minister, but it does highlight that security is not the sole challenge for the Abadi government in April 2015. The recent effort by the PM to bring various militias including those backed by Iran under the control of the state has likely resulted in exacerbating tension between the PM and the militias. It has also given political rivals a direct opportunity to challenge him. The push back from KH provides insight into what to expect in the future if the government takes concrete efforts to take control of the militias. 

Sunday, April 26, 2015

Second Idlib Stronghold Falls to Jabhat al-Nusra and Rebel Forces

By: Jennifer Cafarella

Primarily Islamist and jihadist rebelforces supported by al-Qaeda affiliate Jabhat al-Nusra (JN) seizedcontrolof the regime-held city of Jisr al-Shughour, southwest of Idlib City, on April 25, 2015. Jisr al-Shughour was a major regime stronghold in Idlib Province that many expected to present a difficult, hardened military target to anti-Assad forces. Reports prior to the fall of Idlib City to JN and rebel forces on March 28, 2015 indicated that the regime withdrew military assets to Jisr al-Shughour, possibly indicating regime intent to prioritize its defense over Idlib City. The fall of Jisr al-Shughour to JN and rebel forces is therefore a key indicator of the regime’s inability to defend terrain against increasingly coordinated anti-Assad forces without the assistance of Iranian proxies such as Hezbollah.

JN and rebel forces declared the “Battle of Victory” to seize Jisr al-Shughour on April 22, 2015. Anti-Assad forces made immediate gains following a JN VBIEDattack north of the city allowing JN and rebels to seize threeregime checkpointsand advanceinto the city’s urban terrain. JN and rebel forces exploited their initial penetration to seize wide segments of the city despite considerable regime aerial bombardment. Regime forces withdrew on April 25, allegedlyusing civilians as human shields to cover their withdrawal, and reportedlyexecuting23 detainees held at the Military Intelligence Branch before withdrawing. JN and HASIeach raised a flag in the central square of the city.

The operation was commanded and controlled through a newly established operations room, which coordinatedthe involvement of JN, Ahrar al-Sham (HASI), Jaysh al-Islam, Ansar al-Sham, and the jihadist Jabhat Ansar al-Din coalition. The offensive also included participation from the primarily Chechen jihadist group Junud al-Sham in addition to the Turkistan Islamic Party in Syria. Two FSA-affiliated groups, the First Coastal Division and 13th Division, also participated, according to videos uploadedto YouTube of the groups firing TOW anti-tank missiles near the city. The coordination of this offensive through a joint operations room with large JN participation and likely leadership represents a second major success for JN in northern Syria. JN established a model for the command and control of joint offensives in the Jaysh al-Fatah operations room that seizedIdlib City on March 28. This victory likely incentivized rebel forces to buy into a JN-led operation at Jisr al-Shughour. JN cements its value to Syrian rebels and deepens its foothold in Syria by providing rebel forces with an effective vehicle for establishing unity of effort against the Assad regime, and by directly contributing to battlefield success. The increasingly Islamist and jihadist composition of rebel ranks in northern Syria, in part generated by JN’s action to sideline prominent moderate factions, furthermore strengthens JN’s position in northern Syria.

Logo of the “Battle of Victory” operations room, released via Twitter April 22, 2015

The offensive to seize Jisr al-Shughour was one component of a larger campaign to seize control of the entirety of Idlib Province and to connect rebel systems in Idlib to rebel-held terrain in northern Hama Province. As JN and rebels consolidate in Jisr al-Shughour, two additional offensives are still ongoing. The first, undertaken by the Jaysh al-Fatah operations room, seeks to seize control of remaining regime strongholds south of Idlib City. A major Jaysh al-Fatah offensive is currently underwayagainst the Qarmeedand Mastoumamilitary camps, with likely intent to advance on the regime stronghold of Ariha next. Prior reports indicated that the regime deployedits elite “Tiger Forces” unit to reinforce this area, however the regime’s inability to resupply or further reinforce these positions after the fall of Jisr al-Shughour may enable JN and rebel success. Meanwhile, HASI, Ajnad al-Sham, and other rebel groups continue the “Battle to Free Sahel al-Ghab” to push north through the al-Gahb plain in an attempt to eliminate a regime-held “buffer zone” that separates rebel-held terrain in Hama and Idlib Provinces from the Alawite-majority province of Latakia. This offensive has made considerable gains, seizing numerous towns in the countryside south of Jisr al-Shughour. Together these three offensives are likely to provide sufficient momentum to JN and rebel forces to accomplish their objectives in Idlib Province, and will likely position anti-Assad forces for possible future operations to penetrate key regime terrain in the coastal Alawite heartland in Latakia Province.

Map releasedby Ahrar al-Sham via Twitter, April 25, 2015 depicting the three underway offensives

The ongoing JN and rebel gains in Idlib Province in 2015 have dealt a considerable blow to the Assad regime. They have furthermore demonstrated an increasing sophistication of rebel campaign design, likely enabled by JN’s deepening role. The Jaysh al-Fatah and Sahel al-Ghab operations facilitated the seizure of Jisr al-Shughour by limiting the regime’s ability to reinforce across fronts, while simultaneously pursuing linked objectives. Combined with the successes of rebel forces in southern Syria beginning in late 2014, the seizure of Idlib City and Jisr al-Shughour could indicate that the momentum of the war has turned against the Assad regime. A reinvigoration of rebel combat power has been provided in part by JN’s model for coordinating joint military operations, which has enabled anti-Assad forces to break the stalemate that has characterized Syrian front lines for over a year. Syrian rebels are unlikely to win the Syrian war even with increasing support from JN, but will likely continue to achieve tactical and operational successes. This could force the regime to make hard decisions about the terrain it is able and willing to defend, possibly leading to a contraction in the regime’s deployed military assets as JN and rebels exploit these successes. Alternately, regime commitment to its “army in all corners” strategy could sustain an overextension of Assad’s military power that will continue to provide vulnerable targets to JN and rebel forces outside of major urban centers. The regime’s response to the growing momentum of anti-Assad forces in northern Syria will therefore offer wider lessons regarding the likely trajectory of the Syrian war in 2015.

Monday, April 13, 2015